In this essay I will be looking at three different manners of pictures ; two pictures from the celebrated Vincent Van Gogh and one from the artistic Maurice Vlaminck. I will speak about the seven ocular elements – texture. form. coloring material. tone. line. form and signifier – and if they are used in each picture. Besides I will speak about the brushwork and if they use little brushstrokes or big brushstrokes. These three pictures are all different and demo different state of affairss but they are the same every bit good because they are all images of landscapes. I will speak about how much item is in each picture. ‘The Harvest at La Crau’ is the first picture that I am traveling to speak about. It is by Vincent Van Gogh. Vincent Van Gogh was a Dutch Post- Impressionist painter. Post – Impressionism is a manner that artists would utilize including utilizing graphic colorss. thick usage of pigment and alone coppice shots. He was born in 1853 and died in 1890. His work was beautiful and emotional with its bold colors and rough textures which no 1 was impressed by at the clip he was alive.
However. many people today still love Van Gogh’s work of art and would pay 1000000s for his work. He didn’t fit into any painting school because of his alone coloring material sense. In his life he produced 860 oil pictures. When Van Gogh was a kid he loved to pull and until the twenty-four hours he died. his love for art got stronger and stronger. Unfortunately he had a job ; he had depression because no 1 appreciated his work and he gave up his life and committed self-destruction in 1890. “Harvest at La Crau” was painted in 1888 and the size is 72 ten 92 centimeter. The picture shows a farm life in the Gallic countryside during the harvest season. The picture is divided into three. the foreground. the Fieldss and the workers in the in-between land and the mountains and skies in the background. The foreground shows a fencing and the start of the wheat field. The form of the fencing is effectual because of the mixture of colorss used. You can see hot reds against cold blues. A intimation of white against browns with a line of black to do it more realistic. This portion of the picture is textured with thick pigment demoing the texture of the long dry grass and maize chaff.
The in-between portion shows the remainder of the wheat field and the workers. The wheat Fieldss filled Van Gogh’s head in the fall. and reminded him about his spring visit to Saintes- Maries–de–la- Mer. Even though the workers were hapless. they appear happy and besides demo what is go oning in mundane life for the provincials. who are farming. To the left of the picture there is a big hayrick. with ladders and a adult male working difficult with a pitchfork. Van Gogh besides uses a batch of black to sketch the trees and the edifices which make them look more 3D. The fruit trees look healthy and good. There is a cart following to the hayrick and you can see how Van Gogh idea of tone through this cart because you can see light reflecting off the wheel. A plough follows beside the cart. The hot ruddy / orange coloring material contrasts good because it stands out from the background. These mean the phases of crop. Van Gogh shows the significance of farm work and the life of a provincial. The tones of xanthous contrasts with the violet cold colors of the Alpilles Mountains and the green. unusual sky. I think that this picture is rather impressionist in manner.
It captures the warm. terminal of summer visible radiation on the landscape and Van Gogh likely sat outside with his easel painting what he saw in forepart of him. The background is the sky and the mountains. I have noticed that the back land is smoother than the unsmooth coppice shots in the remainder of painting. The brushstrokes used for the background are little and I think this adds consequence to the sky by doing it more interesting. and it appears farther off. Van Gogh highlighted the mountains with black lines. which is surprising because it makes the mountains look closer. and I would hold expected him to do them look fainter as they are farther off. Possibly he wanted to convey our attending to the mountains because he thought they were beautiful. The following picture I am traveling to state you approximately is “The Starry Night” besides by the celebrated creative person Vincent Van Gogh. “The Starry Night” is a passionate picture which was painted in 1889 in St-Remy- de- Provence. The size is 73. 7cm ten 92. 1cm and like “Harvest at La Crau” he used oil on canvas to paint this work of art.
It is one of his most good known images in modern civilization. This picture shows a dark sky filled with twirling clouds. stars blazing and a eye-popping crescent Moon. The characteristics are embellished and do people experience comfy. The sky is the chief portion of the picture and it keeps the viewing audiences eyes traveling. following the curves and the forms of the stars. The motion in the sky feels more like a warm summer dark than a cold winter dark and this is because of the mixture of warm and cold colors. The foreground is the landscape with all the hills on the skyline and down below the sky. a small town. In the picture there is a peaceable kernel fluxing through the town. The nucleus of this small town is the tall spire of the church. The spire creates a sense of steadiness and size onto the town. Van Gogh has used the ocular component. Line. because he uses a batch of black to sketch the background to do it stand out. but non every bit much as the sky because the sky is the chief portion of the picture.
I think the dark cold colors and the fire windows remind me of memories of my childhood old ages. overruning with imaginativeness of what exists in the dark and dark bubbling stars. At the left of the picture there is a monolithic dark tree which shows that Van Gogh was really wise with the forms of the tree. the small town and the sky. The composing of the tree is outstanding because it shows a 3D consequence and that there is a small town behind it. The curvey lines of the tree remind you of the sky and bring forth that feeling of power in the picture. Most of Van Gogh’s pictures are unsmooth like “The Starry Night” but this is good because it adds more motion and consequence. For the bulk of this picture. Van Gogh has used big coppice shots for the sky which is great because it shows the mixture of colorss used to acquire that strong and “windy” consequence. He takes more clip over the small town giving it more construction and item and for the sky it looked more atmospheric. Although the picture is by and large really dark with blues. inkinesss and purples. this makes the stars and visible radiations from the houses even more eye-popping doing a rather a bright and lively scene.
“Landscape with Red Trees” by Maurice Vlaminck is the concluding picture I am traveling to speak about. Maurice Vlaminck is a Gallic painter who was one of the Godheads of the manner Fauvism. Fauvism is the manner of lupus erythematosuss Fauvists which is Gallic for “the wild beasts” and it is a group of modern creative persons who use strong colorss. He was born in 1876 and died in 1958. He was born in Paris to a household of instrumentalists. After sing a Van Gogh exhibition. he confirmed that he “loved Van Gogh that twenty-four hours more than his ain father” . He was amazed at Van Gogh’s powerful brushstroke and the usage of intense colorss. “Landscape with Red Trees” is a colorful picture by Maurice Vlaminck. It was painted in 1906 – 1907. Like Van Gogh. he used oil on canvas to paint this image. This picture is speedy and energetic utilizing form. coloring material and line instead than tone and signifier. This picture looks modern because of the bold colors used. It looks rushed because you can see spots of the white canvas underneath and there is non much item in this picture but I think the picture looks more interesting because you can see the light and dark colorss and this is typical of Fauvism.
Like Van Gogh. Vlaminck split this picture into three pieces- the foreground. the in-between land and the background – but they are in different topographic points to Van Gogh’s. Vlaminck’s slanting foreground shows a contemplation of the trees and I think the creative person made this expression like a river. He besides uses black shadows in the foreground. He has signed his name in the underside left corner. The trees are besides portion of the foreground from top to bottom. The in-between land is concentrating on the green Fieldss. The form of the trees is really realistic because they are the right size – non excessively thin. non excessively thick. There is besides no item on the trees merely the combination of colorss. Dark blue is used for the dark tones of the trees. This is unusual because the cold blue coloring material and the hot ruddy coloring material don’t mix in the picture and they don’t connect but it is rather effectual for the top of the trees because it looks like shadows and intense visible radiation. Like Van Gogh. he uses bold black lines to sketch the trees and do them stand out more.
The textures on the trees are unsmooth like the ruddy bark. The background is the remainder of the picture i. e. the edifices and the hills. Vlaminck uses blues and pinks for the colors of the hills. The edifices are obviously because it shows the roof is ruddy and the existent edifices. Prunus persica and yellow. The textures of the edifices are smooth but the sky is rougher. I have observed that Vlaminck doesn’t intermix his colors and he puts the colors on top of each other. White is applied to the background to exemplify the sunshine which is shown between the trees. There is no form used in the background or in all the picture because this picture is all coloring material and no item. I think Vlaminck is non bothered by the landscape or the hills. He is more attracted to the ruddy trees. He was walking along in the countryside and he noticed these ruddy trees reflecting out to him.
He believed the trees were intriguing and he loved how the light tones hit off the ruddy bark and he wanted to utilize bright. bold colors. The colorss are besides efficient because you can see the picture if you are standing on the other side of a room and it is decidedly a picture that will catch your oculus. You don’t cognize where to look in this picture because of the broad scope of colorss used. This is really typical of the fauve manner. In decision. my favorite picture of the three pictures is Van Gogh’s ‘The Starry Night’ because I truly like the swirling sky and the feeling of being outside at dark underneath the stars. I like “Harvest at La Crau” because it is to the full elaborate and it is peaceable. In “Landscape with Red Trees” I like it how Vlaminck concentrated on the ruddy trees. but it is a far more foolhardy picture. Van Gogh’s pictures tell more of a narrative and are more elaborate than Vlaminck’s. although they both have strong usage of colorss and line. and this shows how Vlaminck was influenced by Van Gogh’s work.