The Bradford check is a standard quantitative method for the finding of protein concentrations. Bradford reagent used in the check contains Coomassie Blue which produces a characteristic blue coloring material upon adhering to proteins in solution ( Bradford, Anal. Biochem. 72: 248, 1976 ) .. Using a spectrophotometer the optical density of the colored merchandise can be determined. Analysis of multiple samples may affect the usage of a microtitre home base so that samples can be replicated and more dependable consequences obtained. The usage of microtitre home bases besides automates the procedure so consequences are produced really rapidly. Samples are pipetted into multi-well home bases and the optical density values measured utilizing a multi-well microtitre home base reader equipped with a 595 nm filter.

Part 1 – Calibration Data for the Bradford Assay

A standardization curve for the Bradford check in the scope 0.2- 1.0 mg/ml was obtained utilizing three replicates for each concentration, utilizing a microtitre home base. These informations are shown in Figure 1 below. Linear Regression Analysis was performed and the equation of the line of best tantrum, y=mx +c, was produced ( where Y represents optical density, x is the concentration of protein, m is the incline of the line of best tantrum and degree Celsius is the intercept of the line on the y-axis ) .

Figure 1. Protein standardization curve utilizing the Bradford check

Q1. Describe the relationship between protein concentration and optical density for the Bradford check standardization curve.

Q2. What is meant by a ‘line of best tantrum ‘ ?

Q3. Remark on the value of R2

Using the values of the equation of the line of best tantrum, the optical density value for each criterion was used to cipher the existent concentration of protein in each replicate. The mean, standard divergence and coefficient of fluctuation ( ( mean/SD ) x100 % ) were calculated and are presented in Table 1 below:

Table 1. Mean ( ±1S.D. ) protein concentrations of standard replicates and the Coefficient of Variation for each concentration ( n=3 ) .

Standard concentration

( mg/ml )

Average concentration

( mg/ml )

S.D.

( mg/ml )

Coefficient of Variation ( % )

0.2

0.17

0.004

2.1

0.4

0.42

0.008

1.8

0.6

0.62

0.007

1.1

0.8

0.81

0.005

0.6

1.0

0.97

0.013

1.4

Remark on the duplicability of the check in the scope 0.2 to 1.0mg/ml of protein.

Part 2 – Probe of the effects of detergents on the optical density of a set concentration of protein, utilizing the Bradford Assay.

Background

You are portion of a research squad that is looking at the different proteins involved in a cell signalling tract which leads to the increased synthesis of a specific protein, P. One technique used in this work involves the usage of cells kept under tissue civilization conditions. These cells are treated with inhibitors, after which they are broken unfastened by solubilisation of their membranes ( cell lysis ) and the soluble cell contents taken up into solution. Before analysis of the solution for degrees of P, the entire protein content of each lysate has to be determined. One of the reagents in the buffer solution that can be used to solubilise the cell membranes is a detergent. Detergents can do intervention in a protein check. In an probe utilizing the Bradford check, two detergents at different concentrations were exposed to a set concentration of protein ( 0.5mg/ml ) . These are Na dodecyl sulfate ( SDS ) and Triton X. The optical density values were converted into protein concentrations utilizing the equation of the line of best tantrum from the standardization curve and the informations subjected to statistical analysis ( One Way ANOVA ) . Mean informations are compared in Tables 2 and 3, and Figures 2 and 3.

Q4. Describe the consequence of SDS on the Bradford check. Is at that place a relationship between SDS concentration and the measure of protein determined?

Q5. Describe the effects of Triton X on the Bradford check. Is at that place a relationship between Triton X concentration and the measure of protein determined?

Table 2. Mean protein concentrations determined for 0.5mg/ml of protein utilizing the Bradford Assay in the presence of SDS

( NS=No Significant Difference )

Concentration of detergent ( % )

Mean Total Protein Concentration

( mg/ml )

South dakota

( mg/ml )

P-value

( compared with Control )

0 ( Control )

0.497

0.0038

0.2

0.455

0.0032

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

0.5

0.388

0.0037

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

1.0

0.361

0.0023

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

2.0

0.349

0.0015

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

5.0

0.350

0.0022

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

Table 3 Mean protein concentrations determined for the Bradford Assay in the presence of Triton 100-X

Concentration of detergent ( % )

Mean Total Protein Concentration

( mg/ml )

South dakota

( mg/ml )

P-value

( compared with Control )

0 ( Control )

0.497

0.0038

0.2

0.590

0.0018

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

0.5

0.683

0.0021

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

1.0

0.962

0.0054

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

2.0

1.235

0.0068

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

5.0

1.636

0.011

P & A ; lt ; 0.001

Figure 2. Comparison of average protein concentration ( + 1 S.D. ) determined for 0.5mg/mL BSA utilizing the Bradford check in the presence of SDS ( 0.2-5.0 % ) compared with control ( 0 % ) .

Figure 3. Comparison of average protein concentration ( + 1 S.D. ) determined for 0.5mg/mL BSA utilizing the Bradford check in the presence of Triton-100X ( 0.2-5.0 % ) compared with control ( 0 % ) .

Q6. What would you reason from the consequences of the probe with both detergents? What farther experiments might you desire to carry on to look into this further?

Q7. Summarize the information within this papers ( 250 words ) .

Written by
admin
x

Hi!
I'm Colleen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out