Censoring In Television Violence Essay, Research Paper
& # 8220 ; Violence in the media for amusement intents has been established as a major lending factor. Daily, our kids see on the screen that force is fun and exciting and the hero & # 8217 ; s method of pick for work outing their jobs. This statement is greatly emphasized by the anti-violence organisation TRUCE ( Teachers for Defying Unhealthy Children & # 8217 ; s Entertainment ) . Although most people would read this statement as bad intelligence, any logical individual can clearly see the good in it after all. Censorship has ever been a really controversial topic and has become an even greater subject when it concerns the media. Although some people see censoring in telecasting as a good thing, they forget that telecasting sets many good illustrations for kids to follow, portrays violent state of affairss that may fix a kid for existent life danger, and most significantly reveals what the universe is truly similar.
In a kid s life, illustrations of how to act are explicitly set by the parents. Unfortunately, the universe is non a topographic point where all parents set good illustrations. By watching many premier clip situation comedies such as Seventh Heaven, a kid can larn good illustrations of behaviour, such as table manners, by detecting the parents and the kids in a wholesome, loving, household. Television situation comedies such as this, assistance existent life parents in raising their kids to follow good behaviour regulations, but even these shows deal with many violent state of affairss. For illustration, in an episode of Seventh Heaven, a 10-year old male child aimed a laden gun at a priest with purposes of slaying. Some parents may object to holding their childs watch this episode fearing that it may lend to the happening of a similar state of affairs. However, these types of episodes are merely learning kids that guns, slaying, and force are non good solutions. To ban these violent episodes would strip the kid of good lessons to life.
Scenes portrayed on telecasting have become the criterion for lessons learned by kids, whether it s how to act at the dinner tabular array, or what to make in a potentially violent state of affairs. Television force has non diminished greatly ; nor have Saturday forenoon plans for kids, marked by overly violent sketchs, changed much for the better ( Palmer 125 ) . Does this mean that the media has promoted kids to go more violent, hence, making a more violent society? A more logical ground would be the exact antonym: the addition in social force has caused the addition in telecasting force. In which instance, censoring of telecasting would more likely injury our kids instead than assist them. Most parents like the thought of learning their kid to speak their manner out of a violent state of affairs, nevertheless, in today s society this being the best solution is, in fact, really rare. Television that portrays force will merely
fix a kid and most likely learn them how to support themselves in unsafe state of affairss that occur in the existent universe. However, a recent study from the National Institute of Mental Health ( NIMH ) argues that force on telecasting does take to aggressive behaviour ( Methvin 49 ) . This statistic may be really true, but on the contrary, good parents will unite their ain lessons with scenes on telecasting to raise a good, moral, and most significantly, prepared kid.
If a kid was ne’er allowed to go forth the house, so possibly censoring wouldn T be such a bad thought. The kid may populate a happier life if he or she believed that the universe was a perfect topographic point. However, a kid who ne’er sees the outside universe is extremely improbable. Puting a kid, after being blindfolded for many old ages, into the existent universe is like throwing a babe into a swimming pool and stating it to swim. A kid should be prepared when he or she eventually encounters the existent universe for the first clip. The best manner to fix a kid is to allow him or her see the worlds of society through exposure to telecasting. Of class, a human- sized, green ninja polo-neck International Relations and Security Network t a world of the universe, nevertheless, favoritism against different people is. The force and the usage of guns in G.I Joe may non put the best illustration for a kid, but it does demo that war and casualties are besides rough worlds of the universe. There were liquidators traveling around killing tonss of people and stealing jewellery. I am afraid when there is a slaying near because you ne’er know if he could be in town ( Cullingford 61 ) . This statement came from the oral cavity of an 8-year old miss after watching the every night intelligence on telecasting. Reports of violent scenes on the intelligence is, in fact, a good manner to learn kids about the facts of life and how to avoid potentially unsafe state of affairss. In this instance, to drive fright into the 8-year old miss merely prevents her from interacting with complete aliens and put on the lining abduction. Once once more, censoring would more likely put a kid in harms manner instead than lend to good lessons and readying.
Censoring has become a really controversial issue and many old ages may go through before the general sentiment has reached an understanding as to whether or non telecasting should be more or less censored. It is safe to state that there are many grounds to endorse censoring, but perchance more in favour of its remotion. To ban state of affairss that portray existent life merely deprives our kids of good lessons, readying, and world. To ban telecasting puts a censoring on life itself.
Cullingford, Cedric. Children and Television. New York: St.Martin & # 8217 ; s Press, 1984.
Methvin, Eugene H. & # 8220 ; T.V. Violence: The Shocking New Evidence. & # 8221 ; Reader & # 8217 ; s Digest Jan. 1983: 49-54.
Palmer, Edward L. Children and the Faces of Television. New York: Academic Press Inc. , 1980.