With sensible guidelines in topographic point to forestall human right misdemeanors. should polygamy be legal in Canada? First of all. a clear definition of the term is required: “Polygamy occurs when one hubby is married to two or more wives” ( Ozkan. M et Al. 215 ) . This scenario is non common in North America nevertheless has been known to happen in the yesteryear. To derive an penetration to the universe of polygamy. it seems that research has been undertook look intoing its effects in countries of the universe where it is more common. for illustration. the Muslim universe.
The determination as to whether Polygamy should be legal in Canada will be based on the research found on the effects of Polygamy on both the kids of the senior and junior married woman. “A senior married woman is defined as a adult female who was followed by another married woman into the matrimony. A junior married woman is the most recent married woman fall ining the marriage” ( Al-Krenawi. 447 ) . In-depth research has taken topographic point into the emotional. psychological and behavioral effects on kids from polygamous households. every bit good as the effects on academic accomplishment compared to that of monogamous households.
Most experts agree that kids from Polygamous households are negatively affected by polygamy in footings of their academic accomplishment. behavior. and their emotional and physiological stableness. Therefore. Polygamy should non be legal in Canada. in order to protect kids from the harmful effects associated with it. An Probe into the effects on instruction on Bedouin-Arab school kids showed significantly higher scholastic accomplishment in the kids from monogamous households when compared with kids from polygamous households. based on classs in Hebrew. Arabic. Arithmetic and reading comprehension. recorded in their school files.
( Krenawi & A ; Lightman. 350 ) As for behavioral jobs. Krenawi. Graham et al depict how the “Competition for support and resources among married womans in polygamous households may take to tensenesss between co-wives and between the kids of different co-wives” ( 456 ) . The struggles between the married womans are frequently fuelled by green-eyed monster which. in bend. increases the opportunities of struggle between the siblings of the married womans. The addition in struggle and force is likely to ensue in earlier bead out from school and higher chance of yielding to other societal jobs such as drugs.
( Krenawi & A ; Lightman. 353 ) . Al-Krenawi’s journal links the children’s behavioral jobs with their emotional province: “Jealousy. competition and combat among the different married womans leads to the kids sing the kids of the other married woman non as siblings but as enemies. The ensuing hatred and ill will affected the kids both emotionally and socially. ” ( 37 ) . Research has shown that “Such debatable maternal psychosocial kineticss. in bend. may adversely act upon adolescents’ self-identity. self-esteem and psychological well-being” ( Shek 159 ) .
Self-esteem is looked at in great trade throughout the research. Krenawi and Graham define self-pride as a wish to believe good of one’s ego ; It besides relates to self-respect and the person’s perceptual experience of worth. Children from polygamous households are particularly prone to this. due to low-interest from their male parents. particularly kids of senior married womans. Surveies showed lower parental involvement. lower involvement when compared with other siblings contributed to low self-pride among kids in polygamous households. ( 457 ) .
Another tabular array from this diary has consequences which show kids from Polygamous households scored higher in countries including depression. anxiousness. ill will. paranoid ideation and psychotism and hiting lower in household operation ( which includes relationships. operation and communicating within their household ) every bit good as the self-esteem trial. ( 452 ) . We see that these psychological jobs that polygamous kids face are the major subscriber to their deficiency of academic accomplishment. it is non as first thought a direct effect of polygamy.
It is more of an indirect effect of polygamy. Detecting from another position. grounds is found by Cherian that reveals “A positive and statistically important relationship was found between parental involvement and children’s academic accomplishment. regardless of whether the household was monogamous or polygamous” ( 736 ) . Throughout the research into polygamy there were occasions where interviews were conducted with members of polygamous households. first manus grounds can be really powerful nevertheless we see contrasting positions here foremost we will look at those in favor of polygamy.
In the paper ‘Polygamy and its Impact on the Upbringing of Children’ by M. Khasawneh et Al. we see a female parent asked about the impact of polygamy. to which she answers “Did non impact the children” ( 577 ) . There is besides a statement from a kid who states “Polygamy is a really appropriate process” . Clearly displays that both the female parent and a kid of polygamy both seem to back up polygamy. However. if we look at the experts’ sentiment of the female parent Khasawnehs’ paper. we see that they believe that the married womans positions may non be accurate.
Since the households would be cognizant of their responses. it made it hard for the married woman to do an honest declaration. as this could negatively impact her household life ( 572 ) . Although there is small uncertainty that the child’s statement was non an honest 1. we see that there are other responses which do non demo the kids in favor of polygamy. Although a figure of kids believed that their male parents did non know apart between or divide them. several besides did non O.K. of polygamy and seen it as “something they were forces to accommodate to” ( 572 ) .
This position is farther supported by a kid who is asked their sentiment and positions on polygamy to which he answers: “Polygamy is for necessity merely. and with conditions to be merely and just. I do non back up polygamy at all no affair what the grounds are. ” ( 577 ) . Another kid answers the same inquiry with: “I encourage polygamy because there is a big figure of misss. ” ( 577 ) This brings up the status which is really of import for polygamy: If there is an instability in the ratios of male to female so it is a valid statement that polygamy is a solution to spinsterhood.
However Mentioning back to the inquiry on Canada. we find from Statistics Canada online that the population of males and females is about equal 17. 6 to 17. 3 million ( StatCan ) . As for the statement on instruction. although we have observed that parental involvement influences both monogamous and polygamous children’s academic accomplishment. every bit. it is clear that other behavioral. emotional and physiological factors contribute and can potentially hold a harmful consequence on academic accomplishment excessively.
In decision it is clear. from surveies on Polygamy in Muslim states. that there is overpowering grounds to demo that Polygamy has a damaging consequence on the upbringing of kids. and this is made clear in the research environing its negative effects on the married womans. the senior married womans in peculiar. Krenawi and Graham make that point that in order to cut down jobs which associated with polygamy originating. early intercessions by school functionaries and other services may assist better academic accomplishment. socioeconomic position every bit good as improved household operation.
( 455 ) . Mentioning back to the thought of parental involvement being a large subscriber to the academic accomplishment of the kids no affair what household construction they belong to nevertheless it is clear to see that a male parent will hold a certain about of clip available to give to his kids if this clip which was one time for one household entirely is non split between 2 households in 2 different families. it becomes obvious that it will go impossible for the male parent to give an equal sum of his clip that he was able to give in the yesteryear.
Therefore even with sensible guidelines put in topographic point. perchance similar to the 1 practiced in Muslim states. where the hubby must turn out he can financially look after his married womans and kids. I still experience there are a far greater figure of disadvantages to this and therefore it should non be made legal in Canada. Word Count ( 1. 442 ) Bibliography Al-Krenawi. A. Graham. J. R & A ; Sonim-nevo. V. ( 2002 ) Mental Health Aspects of Arab-Israeli striplings from polygamous versus monogamous households.
Journal of societal Psychology. 142. 446-460. Al-Krenawi. S. Lightman. ( 2000 ) . Learning. Achievement and Family conflict Among Bedouin-Arab kids from polygamous and monogamous households. The diary of societal psychological science 140 ( 3 ) . 345-355. Cherian. V. I. ( 1993 ) . The Relationship between Parental involvement and academic accomplishment of Xhosa Children from Monogamous and Polygamous households. The Journal of Social Psychology. 133. 733-736. M. Khasaweh. o. Y. Hijazi. H. Salman. N ( 2011 ) .
Polygomy and Its Impact on the Upbringing of kids. A Jordanian Perspective. Journal of Comperative Family Studies. 563-577 Ozkan. M. Altindag. A. . Oto R & A ; Sentunali. E ( 2006 ) . Mental Health Aspects of Turkish Womans from Polygamous Versus Monongamous Families. Turkey. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. ( 52 ) . 214. Shek. D. T. L ( 1998 ) A Longitudinal Study of the Relation between Parental-adolesent struggle and adolescent psychological wellbeing. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 159. 53-67.