How serious should the menace of a hatred offense be taken? Harmonizing to Ellis Cose. the African American writer of Ignore the Noose Makers. to pay excessively much attending to the amentia of those who hang snares merely to intimidate their black mark. “is to allow them an importance they do non merit. ” Snares have a hideous history associated with them. They are known to be used in lynching ( penalizing people for offenses by private citizens without test. whether they are guilty or non ) . of which three quarters of the instances in American history were against inkinesss. George Curry. another African American writer of Naming Snares What They Are – Terrorism. feels strongly that these menaces are non to be taken lightly. and with that attitude people will non be able to “bridge the racial divide. ”
The American people are protected from hatred offenses and verbal menaces. and the hanging of a snare is a menace in itself of which their victims deserve protection from. The fact that Congress recognizes offenses motivated by prejudice as more serious than the offense committed entirely is non in inquiry. “Congress has passed the Hate Crimes Sentencing Enhancement Act. which increases punishments for some federal offenses when they are motivated by prejudice. ” The argument is whether or non these Torahs should be applied to the widespread visual aspect of snares since 2007. when the intervention of the “Jena 6” received countrywide imperativeness coverage. Snares were hung in a tree at Jena High School in Jena. Louisiana. which caused racial tensenesss to intensify over the months following August 2006. after the rule was overruled when he recommended throw outing the pupils found responsible for the indignation.
A black pupil was attacked in November by a rabble of white pupils. of which one member of the group was charged with battery and released on probation. In bend. a white pupil was attacked after teasing the victim of the old whipping. But the black pupils did non acquire off so easy. They were charged with attempted second-degree slaying. American tribunals need to utilize this as a premier illustration of how a alleged “cry for attention” can intensify into serious. harmful pandemonium. Webster’s Dictionary defines lynching as “the pattern of penalizing work forces for offenses by private unauthorised individuals. without a legal test. . . to bring down penalty without signifiers of jurisprudence. as by a rabble. ”
There were many different signifiers of lynching. all of which are traumatic and unfair ; one may be whipped. shooting. mutilated. dragged behind autos. or burned alive. The most popular pick. though. were public hangings. This is where the noose comes in as a powerful symbol of the atrocious manner in which African Americans suffered at the custodies of their racialist white capturers. most notably the Ku Klux Klan. It is unjust to claim that the hanging of a snare is anything short of a possible hatred offense.
Harmonizing to jurisprudence. it is non illegal for people to hang snares on their ain private belongings. or to expose any other negative antipathy for a minority group based on their faith. sex. political position. race. or other association. The constabulary can non coerce a individual to take any of their personal looks of sentiment and to try to make so would be an obstructor of their constitutionally protected right to freedom of address. If person goes outside their private belongings and hangs a snare in a public country. or the private belongings of another citizen without their permission. the jurisprudence has every right to take it and the persons may be sued by the individual whom is being “attacked” .
There are some who believe a “hate crime” should non keep a more terrible sentence than the offense in itself ; that a individual should non be singled out for crushing up a black adult male because they are black any longer than they should have penalty for assault and battery entirely. But hanging a snare on someone’s doorhandle should be taken into history as a serious menace that deserves attending and probe. Who is to state which of these bullyings are for a ill. twisted laugh and which are existent menaces which will be followed shortly after with action?
There are two solid points in the argument between Ignore the Noose Makers and Calling Nooses What They Are – Terrorism. The intelligent people in America realize that on the other side of the spectrum there are the ignorant. biased persons who hang snares for a laugh. To disregard these people is to strip them of a learning experience capable of doing them understand the impact of their actions on others. There can be no true racial equality until all hate offenses are taken earnestly and people are educated on the history behind the props they use in them. It is hard to do the call as to whether or non the menace perchance associated with hanging a snare will attest itself into world. Still. everyone would instead experience safe than sorry.
Forms for College Writing: A Rhetorical Reader and Guide. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2010.