In Hamlet. imagination of disease. toxicant and decay. are used by William Shakespeare for many intents. Marcellus’ line in Act I illustrates the usage of this imagination really good. “Something is rotten in the province of Denmark. ” Corruptness is rampant. like a contagious disease infecting the tribunal. The ambiance of disease serves to rise the audience’s disgust for the events that are taking topographic point in the drama. Second. disease leads to decease. so the morbid society of Denmark is doomed. Because of this sense of day of reckoning. there is a little prefiguration of the play’s tragic stoping. The tragic ambiance is enhanced by the motive of disease and decay. These descriptions of disease. toxicant. and disintegrate aid us to understand the acrimonious relationships. the dying. helter-skelter ambiance. and besides the emotional and moral decay of the characters bing in the drama.

The image of decay is foremost used at the terminal of Act I to assist grok the depression Hamlet feels in his first monologue about self-destruction. When Hamlet releases the words “O that this excessively sullied flesh would run. melt. and decide itself into a dew. ” ( I. ii. 129-130 ) he communicates how he wishes to non be in this universe any longer. An image of Hamlet’s flesh decomposition and uniting with the dirt is produced. At this minute. Hamlet’s true emotions liberate. and his hurting and his yearn for decease can be felt. Hamlet continues to state “How weary. stale. level. and unprofitable seem to me all the utilizations of this universe! Fie on’t. ah. fie. ’tis an unweeded garden that grows to seed. Things rank and gross in nature possess it simply. ” ( I. ii. 133-137 ) Here. Hamlet feels that the universe around him is useless and in changeless pandemonium. By making these graphic images of decease and decay. Shakespeare lets us peer into Hamlet’s psyche and acknowledge his existent implicit in motives.

Claudius’ relationship with Hamlet is rough. for he harbors a great hatred for his nephew and even feels threatened and at hazard when he is by Hamlet. Claudius says “But like the proprietor of a disgusting disease. To maintain it from unwraping. allow it feed even on the pith of life. ” ( IV. I. 21-23 ) Claudius speaks these lines when he is with the queen after the decease of Polonius. The King says that he is the proprietor of a disgusting disease- Hamlet. The grade to which he despises Hamlet and his end to forestall him from destroying this new life of his is unveiled. This shows us how eternal Claudius’ hatred is towards Hamlet.

Claudius’ utmost choler and defeat is displayed when he says. “For like the hectic in my blood he rages. And though must bring around me. ” ( IV. three. 62-63 ) Claudius describes Hamlet as a barbarous disease going through his ain blood. Hamlet is trapped so deep in the thick of Claudius’ utter hatred of him. that Claudius wants Hamlet dead. Merely when Hamlet is gone. Claudius can be cured from this ghastly disease that he suffers. The images of disease express the echt feelings felt by Claudius. Imagery highlights the hapless. horrid relationship that exists between male parent and stepson. uncle and nephew. male monarch and inheritor. Shakespeare illuminates Claudius’ true sentiment with these images of disease.

Hamlet soberly carries a mutual hate for his uncle who has now become even more affiliated to him as his step-father and who has besides risen in rank to function as the powerful male monarch of England. Hamlet’s cognition of Claudius killing his male parent stems his hatred. therefore Hamlet can non experience anything but disgust and abhoring for him. “Not where he eats. but where ‘a is eaten. A certain convocation of politic worms are e’en at him. Your worm is your lone emperor for diet. We fat all animal else to flesh out us. and we fat ourselves for maggots. ” ( IV. three ; 19-22 ) Claudius has merely asked Hamlet where Polonius is. and Hamlet answers of all time so jeeringly by stating he is at dinner.

Hamlet killed Polonius and hates Claudius so much that he can even talk of the decease of the King’s friend with such coarseness. By stating “A adult male may angle with the worm that hath eat of a male monarch. and eat of the fish that hath Federal of that worm. ” ( IV. three. 25-26 ) Hamlet once more proves his hatred towards the King. Through his blazing discourtesy. Hamlet surprises the King with the fact that even Kings can disintegrate and be eaten. Hamlet’s smart and underhand remarks have implicit in significances that reveal to us his deep. ageless hatred for the male monarch. The images of decay and decomposing expose us to Hamlet’s true feelings for the King.

The morality of several characters besides decay. For illustration. Gertrude wittingly commits criminal conversation by get marrieding her husband’s brother merely months after his decease. Merely after Hamlet’s exchange with her in Act III does she look to experience guilt or compunction for what she has done. Gertrude may be an evidently morally corrupt character. but the centre of the play’s evil secret plans and true degeneracy resides in Claudius. Claudius’ list of wickednesss include the slaying of his brother and usurp of his land so matrimony of his sister-in-law. In Act III he openly admits his guilt and attempts to pray for forgiveness but is unable to set his bosom into it. demoing that he does non truly repent his wickednesss. In add-on. Claudius is besides a operator and a dissembler. This is revealed in Act IV when Laertes comes to Claudius demanding retaliation. and the male monarch builds up Laertes’ fury and directs it towards Hamlet. He plans assorted conniving strategies such as directing Hamlet to England to unwittingly be executed. When this secret plan fails. he stoops down even lower as to seek to poison him.

But Hamlet can be said to merit some of these cases as penalties. though for Hamlet’s moral character besides changes wholly through the class of the drama. Initially. Hamlet was highly cautious ; he was non certain of the true nature and goodness of the shade and even doubted if Claudius had really murdered his male parent. hence his determination to non move until he was certainly. as shown by his “Rogue and Peasant Slave” monologue at the terminal of Act II. Likewise. at the terminal of Act III he once more puts off killing Claudius because he does non desire his father’s liquidator to travel to heaven. which would happen if he died while praying. Furthermore. Hamlet was one time really painstaking. but in Act IV he all of a sudden stabs Polonius through the curtain. believing it is Claudius. and from that point his moralss and morality falls quickly downhill. Finally. he ruthlessly sends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. his old friends and intimates. to their deceases merely for functioning the male monarch and besides to salvage himself.

His “How all occasions inform against me” monologue in Act IV demonstrates how his precedences have changed excessively. and he will eventually try to move in order for retaliation and besides to continue his award. Hamlet speaks of Fortinbras’ courage and his ain cowardliness and concludes. “O. from this clip Forth. my ideas be bloody. or be nil deserving! ” ( IV. four. 65-66 ) This Hamlet of bloody ideas and retaliation is wholly different from the old Hamlet who one time had to be certain that Claudius was guilty beyond a sensible uncertainty before his slaughter. In this drama moral rules within legion characters experience a significant decay.

It is apparent that Shakespeare uses the imagination of toxicant. decay and disease to develop and heighten the assorted struggles environing the drama and besides the heavy. disarrayed atmosphere vibrating over it. In Hamlet we genuinely see what a great trade of depth imagination provides us with. The imagination of disease. toxicant and decay gives us a opportunity to truly understand the complicated emotions that the characters experience in their head and psyche. The reader perceives the permeant helter-skelter temper. assisting them to better understand all facets of this authoritative work. Besides. with the imagination created by Shakespeare. we as readers. can really grok the feelings that are experienced by the characters in Hamlet. that are non ever obvious. but remain decidedly really of import to procure optimal apprehension of a great piece of literature.

Written by

I'm Colleen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out