Literature can reflect the lives of single characters and more significantly it can let the reader to set the character or struggle in context by uncovering the community through the eyes of the person. In the cases of William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” and John Updike’s “A & A ; P. ” the community plays a cardinal function for the storyteller. The community and people are filtered through the lens of Sammy the check-out procedure male child and the unknown storyteller.Both belong as portion of the larger community but their observations allow the reader to reap a closer. though colored expression of the other characters such as Emily and the misss rolling through the A & A ; P.
Their narratives reveal the closed esthesias of two communities separated by decennaries and the springs of modernness. but the New England town of Updike’s narrative is no less judgmental or structured than the Faulkner’s nineteenth century southern community.In “A Rose for Emily. ” Faulkner shows Emily merely through the eyes of the other community members. Haughty and self-contained. she is portion of the community legend but non portion of the world of the town.
described from the beginning as “a tradition. a responsibility. and a attention ; a kind of familial duty upon the town” ( Faulkner. W.
2001 ; p. 79 ) .Their daily lives continue with or without the presence of Emily. her decease excites merely wonder.
She is a living eccentricity who in her secretiveness has elicited the town’s wonder. They feel “not pleased precisely but vindicated” ( 2001 ; p. 80 ) in Emily’s inability to get married successfully and heartened by the commiseration they can experience for her fiscal passs.The single adult female has long fallen to the roadside as the fable of her uneven nature is absorb as traditional knowledge. Presented through the eyes of the storyteller. the reader ne’er truly attains a complete apprehension of Emily as an single character. Alternatively. Faulkner presents both facts and guesss to demo the mixture of chitchat and fact that had created the myth of Emily.
Stripped of her individualism by her inability to be portion of the community and the community’s inability to accept her. Emily becomes a planar imitation of a adult female.The world of her preceding old ages. shown in the long-dead cadaver prevarication in the nuptial chamber and the grey hair upon the pillow beside. will merely be added to this myth. The storyteller makes no effort to explicate this unusual image but implies in the signifier of the remainder of the narrative that this will be added to the fable.Faulkner’s narrative shows how the community can alter an person into a narrative. through their perceptual experiences and judgements.
Updike’s “A & A ; P” shows a similar tendency in how judgmental premises can replace the world of an person. The community in this instance is the closed community of an afternoon supermarket crowd who represent the town at big. In much the manner Faulkner’s storyteller reflects the positions of the town. Sammy expresses and relays the perceptual experiences of the “few house-slaves in pin curlers” ( Updike. J. . 2001 ; p.
33 ) and the judgmental director.His observations of the other people in the supermarket and their reactions to the misss. both verbal and non-verbal. demo the community’s perceptual experience of the girls’ character based on shallow premises. Sammy besides inadvertently reduces the misss to incarnations of his ain sexual desires. While he is outraged at the intervention they receive.
he seems more bothered by the manner the sentiments of the community change his ain vision of the “Queenie” ( 2001 ; p. 32 ) and her friends.Like Emily.
the girls’ represent myths for Sammy separately and the community. For Sammy the myth is created from his ain endocrine fueled ideals that inspire him to the “heroic” gesture of discontinuing his occupation. But why did he non merely stand up for the misss? It is simple. he has created in his minda romantic myth where he is the hero.
and they the demoiselles in hurt. For the community. the misss represent a myth of the immorality and indecency of young person. Their open flesh simply highlights their turning adulthood from the easy credence of small misss to questionable adolescents on the cusp of muliebrity.Both narratives show how the myths of persons can be created by the perceptual experiences and attitudes of their communities.
These myths exist outside the closed ranks of the community because the the community’s inability to accept their difference. With Miss Emily the difference lies in her eccentricies. For the “Queenie” and her friends their difference lies in the community’s troubles in accommodating these generational alterations with the kids they one time were and the adult females they would go. Unable to accept these adult females as portion of the community’s indentity. they are reduced to mere myths in the eyes of the community members.MentionsFaulker.
W. ( 2001 ) . A Rose for Emily.
In R. Diyanni ( Ed. ) . Literature: Reading Fiction. Poetry and Drama.
( fifth erectile dysfunction. ) . New York: McGraw Hill.
pp. 79.Updike. J. ( 2001 ) . A & A ; P. In R. Diyanni ( Ed.
) . Literature: Reading Fiction. Poetry and Drama. ( fifth erectile dysfunction.
) . New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 32.