Systematic literature reappraisal on put to deathing scrum patterns in Global package development

Abstract-This paper exhibits the systematic literature reappraisal on present survey available on the scrum patterns using to challenges in planetary package development undertakings discoursing benefits and restrictions of this most adaptative nimble approach-scrum. The hunt twine used for the primary survey involves keywords like planetary package development, scrum, nimble methodological analysiss and literature reappraisal. We acquired 732 consequences for our hunt utilizing keywords as stated below, we shortlisted the articles following inclusion/exclusion standards and quality appraisal standards to 12 articles back uping our primary survey. This paper concludes the taking challenges that are identified when scrum patterns are applied to planetary package development.

Keywords-Global package development, scrum methodological analysiss, nimble attacks, literature reappraisal, literature study, challenges, issues, literature map

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

2. Introduction

2.1 Context:

Global package development is the present trend in package development field [ 1 ] [ 2 ] . GSD displays some outstanding characteristics like cut downing development cost, improved web substructure, increased time-to-market force per unit area, accounting to different nimble patterns there is no research exhibiting the effectual agile methodological analysis for GSD. [ 3 ]

Similar to GSD, Agile methodological analysiss are increasing tendency in present package development because of its outstanding benefits such as transparence between squad members, regular communicating with client and stakeholders and altering demands often [ 4 ] .so many industries and organisations are developing involvements in puting nimble methodological analysiss in GSD [ 5 ] . When using agile methodological analysiss some challenges are mitigated in GSD. There has non been any literature or reappraisal on decreasing every challenge of GSD.

We have chosen scrum as it is the most adaptative and turning nimble methodological analysis, many undertaking directors, research workers and practicians are demoing their involvements in using scrum methodological analysis in GSD [ 5 ] [ 6 ] . we studied, synthesized and reviewed on the present literature extracted on scrum in GSD undertakings. Most of the reappraisal has been done on agile methodological analysiss using to project direction, as we identified that scrum is the most adaptative agile methodological analysis establishing on the hunt consequences we obtained and informations extracted. we selected scrum as our nimble methodological analysis.

The following section trades with scrum and its engagement in GSD.we have drawn some reappraisal inquiries in subdivision 3. We have stated the reappraisal methodological analysis and quality appraisal standards in subdivision 4 and 5 severally. The restrictions and treatments in our findings are expressed in subdivisions 6 and 7 severally. As far our literature concerned we have drawn some consequences and decisions in last subdivision of our reappraisal.

2.2 Background and Aims:

We ab initio discuss about scrum and its engagement in GSD and subsequently our aims in this reappraisal.


Scrum is an agile methodological analysis which unveils iterative and incremental manner of attack in project direction. Scrum proposes incremental package development called “sprints” . In dash the backlogs are being exploited and sprint merchandise is released for every loop ( normally for 2-4 hebdomads ) [ 6 ] . For every dash, the coaction between stakeholder and scrum squad is full filled with dash reappraisal meetings held for about 4 hours after completion of a dash. In this meeting, the scrum squad demonstrates the entire work done in that dash. The scrum squad members communicate by day-to-day scrum meetings held for 15 proceedingss. Each squad member should reply the inquiries in their day-to-day scrum meeting: [ 7 ]

1 ) What did they make yesterday?

2 ) What will they make tomorrow?

3 ) What are the hurdlings in their manner?

The challenges in GSD are- communicating steps and uncertainness in demands, where scrum is the effectual agile methodological analysis which overcomes maximal challenges in GSD with synchronal communicational techniques and scrum reappraisal meetings with stakeholders. The scrum is besides an effectual methodological analysis for distributed package development where there is lack of clip direction and socio-diversity jobs [ 8 ] .

2.3 Aim:

The chief aims of our literature reexamine are-scrum patterns in GSD and place the benefits and challenges of scrum patterns when applied to GSD.

2.4 Method:

In this systematic literature reappraisal, we pursued some methods to fulfill our reappraisal inquiry with the aid of some informations beginnings like Inspec, Scopus, IEEE Explore, ACM.

We followed the exclusion standards by choosing merely relevant literature from the past 10 old ages published documents which are equal reviewed and holding maximal commendations and remotion of extra documents that can non entree full text.


The reappraisal inquiries we obtain in this systematic literature reappraisal are as follows:

RQ1.what are the challenges in Global package development?

– The reply to this inquiry elevates the cognition about GSD and its challenges. As we said earlier, reading this paper exhibits the outstanding challenges in GSD. Inspite of these outstanding challenges, there are many other challenges set uping GSD.As our paper focuses on the scrum patterns on these outstanding challenges in GSD, cognizing about these challenges researcher can pick their interesting facet in challenges and work out it.

RQ2.What are the scrum patterns affecting in extenuating the outstanding challenges in Global package development?

-Answering to the inquiry RQ1, research worker can cognize the bing outstanding challenges in GSD, by replying to RQ2 research worker can cognize assorted scrum patterns and about particular scrum patterns involved in extenuating the outstanding challenges in GSD. Answer to the RQ1 can merely assist the research worker to concentrate on necessary scrum patterns to get the better of the known challenges in GSD.


The reappraisal methodological analysis used in this literature reappraisal is achieved by following the guidelines of B.A.KITCHENHAM [ 9 ] .

4.1 Pilot survey:

In Pilot survey, both the writers conducted hunt for different articles by bordering many hunt strings with obtained keywords. Finally the hunt twine is:

( ( “issues” OR “factors” OR “concerns” OR “approaches” OR “challenges” OR “practices” OR “method*” ) AND ( “scrum” OR “agile” ) AND planetary package development )

We have got many consequences but can’t find the relevant paperss for our primary survey and we refined the hunt twine by using some techniques noted in below sections.

4.2 Refining research inquiry and/or hunt strings:

In this systematic literature reappraisal, the research inquiries are concluded by choosing the initial keywords for our primary survey like “scrum” ”agile” and “global package development” . The whole reappraisal revolves on these keywords which helped in developing our RQ1 on generalising GSD issues, and subsequently on polishing the hunt strings harmonizing to inclusion/exclusion standards the relevant paperss we obtained for our primary surveies majorly trades in scrum patterns extenuating GSD challenges which assisted us in bordering our RQ2.

Keywords used in search strings:

Scrum, planetary package development, challenges, issues, nimble attacks, distributed package development, concerns, systematic literature reappraisals.

These keywords are used in assorted hunt strings in bordering reappraisal inquiries are as follows:


Search twine


Scrum, planetary package development

( “Scrum” AND “global package development” )

Idea on survey done to day of the month

Scrum, planetary package development, issues, concerns

( ( “Scrum” AND “global package development” ) AND ( “issues” OR “concerns” ) )

To lookup the issues and concern on using scrum in GSD

Scrum, planetary package development, issues, concerns, challenges, restrictions, benefits.

( ( “Scrum” AND “global package development” ) AND ( “issues” OR “concerns” OR “benefits” ) AND ( challenges OR restrictions ) )

Demonstrates the challenges of scrum in GSD with issues and benefits

Literature reappraisal, literature study, systematic literature reappraisal, Scrum, planetary package development, issues, concerns, challenges, restrictions, benefits

( ( “literature review” OR “literature survey” OR “systematic literature review” ) AND ( “Scrum” AND “global package development” ) AND ( “issues” OR “concerns” OR “benefits” ) AND ( challenges OR restrictions ) )

It shows the being of literature reappraisal and systematic literature reappraisal and any studies antecedently done on our survey with sing the above consequences

4.3 Search scheme:

Harmonizing to formulated research sphere both the writers formed some initial hunt strings and searched in different informations beginnings like Inspec, Scopus, ACM, IEEE XPLORE and refined the hunt strings utilizing the keywords and equivalent word to those words and tried our best in minimising the hunt consequences and selected a rubric randomly to acquire basic cognition about the survey done on our subject and polishing the hunt twine once more to derive the specific articles fulfilling our research inquiries. The specific keywords we used in our hunt twine in last loop like systematic literature reappraisal, literature reappraisal and literature survey-these keywords ushers us in researching the old systematic literature reviews or studies in our research sphere to day of the month.

4.4 Inclusion/Exclusion standards:

In this paper, we both the writers included and excluded our hunt consequences on different facets to acquire productive and efficacious consequences.

Included standards:

1. Articles should be merely in English.

2. Articles from the twelvemonth 2000 are included as the research survey on scrum patterns in GSD originates from that twelvemonth.

3. Articles should be peer-reviewed.

4. Articles relevant to challenges in GSD and general scrum patterns are besides considered.

5. Articles should be either conference paper or journal paper.

Excluded standards:

1. Articles that are non peer-review.

2. Articles before the twelvemonth 2000.

3. Articles which is non a conference or journal paper

4. Articles which are non relevant to our research sphere

5. Articles which are repeated.

4.5 Quality Assessment Criteria:

In our systematic literature reappraisal we both writers have selected merely the peer-reviewed articles in our hunt consequences from 2000 in IEEE XPLORE as it consists of documents issued by IEEE and peer-reviewed itself show that they are examined by group of experts. We both writers check for commendations for every article we get, as commendations can be straight comparable to quality. The standards involve choosing the relevant articles fulfilling our survey and inclusion and exclusion standards should be appropriate and perfect.

4.6 Data Extraction:

In the beginning, we both the writers refined the hunt strings repeatedly utilizing keywords and replacing some keywords with equivalent word and executed the twine in informations beginnings like Inspec, we obtained around 39 articles from which we started polishing them in Fieldss like linguistic communication, choosing publications in IEEE and IEE computing machine society and picking merely conference and journal documents we have obtained merely 12 which 8 articles are done after the twelvemonth 2008 so we started choosing the articles sing their rubrics but we can’t read all the abstracts due to clip restraint, but we have extracted the related and relevant rubrics from hunt consequences and hive away them in Zotero to take all the extra files from all the articles we both writers obtained by sing publication and writers name and type of paper.


As we stated earlier in subdivision 4.4, following inclusion and exclusion standards consequences in this survey in systematic literature reappraisal. Both the writers followed the standards and achieved minimal figure of hunt consequences in last loop and see the articles by cross checking. We focused on the instance surveies and studies conducted in our literature as they depict quantitative consequences for our survey. The inclusion standard is done by put to deathing the most refined hunt twine in informations beginnings, we both writers achieved the undermentioned hunt consequences at first loop:

Data base






The exclusion standards works here to get minimal hunt consequences in all databases. some of the effectual exclusion standards -articles before 2008 are non reviewed, merely the IEEE and IEEE computing machine society published articles are selected, all the articles non relevant to our subject and non fulfill our primary survey and research sphere are eliminated, all articles which are non peer-reviewed and contain extra documents and those articles which are repeated are eliminated.

Following the above inclusion and exclusion surveies our consequences are diminished:

Data base






6. Result

The concluding result of selected peer-reviewed articles from Inspec and Scopus by both the writers are 12 from 2008-2013. The tabular array below depicts the figure of articles found in different databases in several old ages:



















By using all the methods in inclusion and exclusion standards efficaciously, both the writers did non happen any article before 2009 relevant to our primary survey.

The articles we considered to our reappraisal with brief drumhead are as follows:

  • Damian.D, Moitra.D had classified that GSD is a increasing trend in undertaking direction, same thing has been briefly explored by SandhyaRani. Dodda and RehanJavedAnsari in their thesis paper [ 1 ] [ 2 ] .
  • E.Carmel identifies the benefits of GSD in his conference paper, same issue is besides discussed by James D.Herbsleb and Deependra moitra in their journal article with challenges in GSD [ 3 ] [ 8 ] .
  • Ken Schwaber had categorized the inquiries of squad member in their day-to-day scrum meetings really efficaciously [ 4 ] .
  • J. Sutherland, K.Schwaber had identified the growing of involvement in undertaking directors to implement scrum patterns in GSD [ 5 ] . This is supported strongly by Emam Hossain, Muhammad Ali Babar and Hye-young paik in their systematic literature reappraisal on scrum patterns in GSD [ 6 ] .

7. Discussion

The principle findings of our survey are to extenuate the challenges in GSD utilizing scrum patterns. The above consequences exhibits the survey extracted from 12 peer-reviewed articles, in which 8 articles are sorted to be the most relevant to our reappraisal literature, all these articles are peer-reviewed and were conference or diary articles, and comprises of maximal commendations in Scopus.

These articles are equally distributed between both writers to analyze the full text of the article and verified each other’s work, interchange our ideas and subsequently classified the whole survey on available literature. We Pen downed the similar points and discussed on unsimilarities arose in our survey. This helps us in pull outing most of the relevant information from available literature.


In this systematic literature reappraisal there are some restrictions identified such as-

  • Some articles we acquired from databases and found relevant to our survey but doesn’t comprise of full text, so we may miss some valuable information.
  • Literature reappraisal is the survey on the work that has already been done and published by many research workers in their ain positions, so any misconceptions in their quantitative consequence effects our reappraisal consequences.
  • Problems in using the inclusion/exclusion standards expeditiously with our hunt strings.
  • From the relevant articles extracted by the writers at that place has been a batch of survey on challenges in GSD but there is less equal articles showing scrum patterns for extenuating the outstanding challenges in GSD.

Except these restrictions we did non happen any other cogency menaces in our systematic literature reappraisal.


Global package development is a turning trend in package industrial direction [ 1 ] [ 2 ] . But the challenges in GSD avert many industries from electing GSD. We both writers present systematic literature reappraisal on the peer-reviewed journal paper or conference paper bordering two reappraisal inquiries ( in subdivision 3 ) , exhibiting scrum patterns to extenuate outstanding challenges in GSD. The research workers should concentrate on mapping scrum patterns for assorted direction challenges in GSD.


Written by

I'm Colleen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out