Role Of Afro-Cubans In The War Of Independence Essay, Research Paper

What distinguished the concluding War of Independence ( 1895-1898 ) from the earlier Ten Years & # 8217 ; War ( 1868-1878 ) and the ephemeral Guerra Chiquita ( 1879-1880 ) was the war & # 8217 ; s success throughout the bulk of the island, the concluding ouster of the Spanish through the American intercession, the bridal of an classless political orientation by a extremist multiracial military leading, and the iconization of the war & # 8217 ; s two most august heroes: Jos? Mart? and Antonio Maceo. As has been documented, the purposes of the release were modified when elect Cuban plantation owners joined the insurrectionist cause get downing in 1896 and brought their societal docket to bear on the civil wing of the separationist cause ( P? rez 1983:125 ) . The release ground forces under M? ximo G? mez, nevertheless, sought to extinguish the really socio-economic footing of Cuban society by razingl the sugar plantations as a agency towards making a more classless society. While the division between the civilian and the armed forces was in fact a determinant factor for the concluding result of the war and led to the intercession of the United States, the tenseness between the two wings has gathered excessively much attending at the disbursal of analyzing how category and racial struggles before the concluding war were the beginning of ulterior divisions among the separationists ( Ferrer 1995:283 ) . By discoursing the historiography of Afro-Cuban nationalist discourse, a mythologized vision of nationalist integrity emerges which was reproduced and interpreted otherwise by diverse sections of the separationist forepart, but however served to mobilise huge Numberss of Afro-Cubans against the Spanish in an unprecedented show of force.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Afro-Cubans participated in greater Numberss during the concluding war, and while there were divisions among them every bit good, a bulk of these former slaves on the rebel side shared a nationalist vision for a freer, more classless Cuba ( Helg 1995:44 ) . The beginning of this vision can be located in their battle for release from bondage itself and their engagement in the failed rebellion of the Ten Years & # 8217 ; War. Rebecca Scott ( 1994:81 ) studies that in the early 1860s, 173,000 slaves resided on around 1,500 sugar estates in Cuba. Before bondage was outlawed in 1886, over 100,000 former slaves had already gained freedom through self-purchase, flight, legal agencies, and single agreements. In add-on the Pact of Zanj? N with Spain at the decision of the Guerra Chiquita had secured the freedom of all slaves who had fought for the Rebel cause. It is in the intermediary period after the Guerra Chiquita and before the War of Independence that the argument over the Afro-Cubans & # 8217 ; function in old wars and their engagement in future release ground forcess was to find the character of their nationalist individuality and the eventual treachery which Afro-Cuban veterans experienced after 1898.

The argument was over the inquiry of gratitude. Concentrating on the Hagiographas of Afro-Cuban journalists in the early 1890s, Ferrer ( 1995:254-268 ) paperss the reactions of Juan Gualberto G? mez and Rafael Serra to the general feeling among white Cubans that the abolishment of bondage indebted ex-slaves and all people of the raza de colour to political commitment with the Autonomist Party for vote intents. Harmonizing to Serra in 1893, while non challenging that Whites had led the old war attempts, Afro-Cubans had non been gracefully freed by their white Masterss, but alternatively they had fought for their freedom in the war and were therefore & # 8216 ; entitled & # 8217 ; to equality. This statement was rebutted by Manuel Sanguily who reaffirmed white distinction in the Ten Years & # 8217 ; War and reasserted that black liability to white Cubans should be expressed by political commitment.

To understand G? mez & # 8217 ; conceptualisation of Afro-Cuban patriotism, we must foremost turn to the ideas of J? se Mart? who espoused a qualified racial equality. An anti-annexationist to the terminal, Mart? was engaged in a counterdiscourse against Spanish propaganda of the rise of & # 8216 ; another Haiti & # 8217 ; while he advocated a revolution against the Cuban societal order. Afro-Cubans took Mart? & # 8217 ; s statement to bosom that, & # 8220 ; the greater the enduring the greater right to justice & # 8221 ; ( P? rez 1983:106 ) . As the laminitis of the PRC ( Cuban Revolutionary Party ) in 1892, Mart? became the voice of the civil arm of the radical motion abroad, and Afro-Cuban subjects embraced his ideals as justification for the avowal of their & # 8220 ; Cubanness & # 8221 ; and the legitimization of their call for equal rights ( Ferrer 1995:266 ) .

Consequently, G? mez and others described their battle non as an avowal of their Africanness, but as an attempt to unify all Cubans. These Afro-Cuban journalists characterized the civil rights battles of the 1890s as & # 8220 ; Cuban & # 8221 ; battles and countered the accusal of the menace of a & # 8220 ; race war & # 8221 ; with the slight that it was in fact certain white sectors & # 8217 ; prolongation of racialist attitudes that posed the existent menace to integrity ( Ferrer 1995:266 ) . In 1887, the Directorio Central de las Sociedades de la Raza de Color was created by Afro-Cubans led by Juan Gualberto G? mez in order to dispute the Spanish authorities & # 8217 ; s racialist Torahs. The PRC publically endorsed the Directorio & # 8217 ; s do as opposed to other major white party elements: the pro-Spanish Constitutional Union and the broad Autonomists ( Helg 1995:45 ) . However, even members of the white separationists like Manuel Sanguily did non portion Mart? & # 8217 ; s positions towards racial equality.

White separationist authors such as Ram? n Roa, Manuel de la Cruz, Jos? Mart? , and Manuel Sanguily focused on countering Spanish propaganda by qualifying the Afro-Cubans & # 8217 ; function in the Ten Years & # 8217 ; War as a positive 1. The black Rebel was conceptualized as the & # 8220 ; obedient insurrectionist & # 8221 ; who was inspired to contend by his former maestro and expressed gratitude towards the independency leaders who had granted him his freedom ( Ferrer 1995:229 ) . The Afro-Cubans & # 8217 ; function in the war was treated as secondary to the superior function of the Whites. Such a revising of history is surely non alone and finds analogues in Roosevelt & # 8217 ; s word picture of the Rough Riders & # 8217 ; & # 8216 ; triumph & # 8217 ; at San Juan Hill ( Kaplan 1993 ) . However, in contrast to Roosevelt & # 8217 ; s negative portraiture of Afro-american soldiers, for Mart? , the Afro-Cuban soldiers were depicted as heroes who were important for the building of a free Cuban democracy. Mart? asked rhetorically, & # 8220 ; How could a race war erupt, when white and black Cubans had already fought together as brothers? & # 8221 ; ( Ferrer 1995:240 ) In this sense the Afro-Cuban journalists and the white separationist authors shared the position that the Ten Years & # 8217 ; War was a redemptional war for Cuba since it effected the freedom of many slaves and offered rapprochement through the fraternity established in the ranks of the ground forces.

Afro-Cubans did non organize a united forepart after they had freed themselves from the bonds of bondage. Ferrer ( 1991:40 ) provinces that inkinesss were non united during the Guerra Chiquita, that some served in the Spanish Army, edited pro-Spanish newspapers, and acted as undercover agents against the Afro-Cuban Rebels. In the same subdivision, Ferrer writes:

Alliances were non determined by factors of either race or category entirely. Rather they resulted from the inevitable meeting of race and category in a society dominated by the establishment of & # 8220 ; racial & # 8221 ; bondage and privileged, white belongings proprietors.

Therefore, while racial individuality was a factor which led to Afro-Cuban confederations and a turning sense that they were involved in a popular motion taking to societal alteration, the socioeconomic transitional state of affairs of the bulk of inkinesss following 1886 was a more deciding factor every bit far as the range and success of alliance-building. Space does non allow a thorough treatment of the technological passage in sugar production which coincided with the emancipation of slaves and has been discussed elsewhere ( see Ayala 1995 ; Scott 1985, 1994 ) . The former slaves combined subsistence production with pay labour, and had more ties to metropoliss through the employment adult females were able to procure at that place. There was a displacement to seasonal pay labour in the sugar plantations, and this fact combined with the decentalisation of cane production made the plantations susceptible to arise activity. Furthermore, in the new labour clime, white and Chinese immigrants worked beside former slaves ( Ayala 1995:96 ) . When workers were displaced by the concluding war, these sections would contend side by side. Helg ( 1995:32 ) points out that the racial barrier was

more fluid in the Oriente where there was already a big free black population before 1886.

The Oriente held the largest black population on the island and was the site of initial Rebel activity in both the Ten Years & # 8217 ; War and the War for Independence. The Ten Years & # 8217 ; War was ne’er successful in going an island-wide rebellion and portion of the ground for this may be attributed to the effectivity of Spanish propaganda that the Oriente inkinesss were be aftering a race war to set up an independent black democracy. Some white breakaway leaders were persuaded to put down their weaponries under the Spanish force per unit area ( Ferrer 1991:41 ) . In the early 1890s Afro-Cuban journalists claimed that inkinesss were excessively weak and inactive to consequence a war against white swayers, whether Spanish or Cuban ( Ferrer 1995:254 ) . Their statement was that such a war would counter the additions of the Ten Years & # 8217 ; War under the model black leading of Antonio Maceo and Guillermo Moncada. Ferrer ( 1995:274 ) argues that while Spanish propaganda of a race war succeeded in detering possible protagonists in the early 1870s in Camaguey and in 1879-1880 in Oriente, in 1896 Havana the claim was non successful. Doctors and attorneies from the white elite joined the motion and revaluated their negative positions of black insurrectionists. Helg ( 1995:234 ) offers a different reading and argues that the propaganda of the menace of a race war was perpetuated by the white Cuban elite after the Spanish were defeated, and it was still in force until the racist slaughter of 1912, which quashed any future political organizing by Afro-Cubans for some clip.

Spanish accusals that inkinesss were be aftering a race war were exposed as dissentious schemes by Mart? and other white separationists, but to the hurt of the separationist cause, racism was used as a tool to consequence the signifier which the war was to take. When Mart? died in May of 1895, Tom? s Estrada Palma, a pro-annexationist, took over the PRC leading. Civilian and military divisions became more tense, and the civilian arm of the military began to reaffirm white domination in the naming of the component assembly and in the policy of officer publicity. The probationary authorities, with Salvador Cisneros Betancourt as President, held the economic involvements of plantation holders to continue traditional societal hierarchies over what had been expressed as the ends of the revolution by the military, viz. , the devastation of traditional societal inequalities. When Maceo effected important triumphs in the West in January of 1896, the probationary authorities distrusted his motivations and claimed he had a concealed dictatorial program. Maceo was clearly worried approximately this as he had criticized Juan Gualberto G? mez & # 8217 ; sociedades de colour because they could feed such accusals. As P? rez ( 1983: seventeen ) has argued, in 1895 there was a acknowledgment among many separationists that category and racial inequalities were non merely caused by Spanish colonial regulation, but were ingrained in the Cuban societal system. That such inequalities surfaced within the separationist forces, particularly towards the terminal of the war, are non so surprising when it is understood that racial equality was a myth created by white Cubans to make popular support, believed by Afro-Cubans, and was to some extent realized inside the ranks of the seditious ground forcess.

In 1896, the probationary authorities awarded committees to civilians keeping academic grades or certain administrative places. This policy conflicted with the virtue system that had evolved in the military ranks where soldiers would be promoted harmonizing to their heroism and experience. Since this translated into more white officers, notwithstanding the fact that many of the black officers had been killed in conflict, Afro-Cuban soldiers such as Ricardo Batrell Oviedo felt resentment towards white elites who had non made many forfeits but had higher places ( Ferrer 1995:279 ) . Negative feelings were besides fueled by the fact that many inkinesss were given humble places. Adding coals to the fire, in 1897, the foremost lasting black leader of the revolution, Quint? n Bandera had his bid stripped by his ain ground forces through a court-martial process. Ferrer ( 1998 ) makes the point that his animadversion was a complex signifier of favoritism that had every bit much to make with the white separationists & # 8217 ; fright of the Oriente-version of multiracial insurgence as with the rejection of his inkiness and low beginnings. Ferrer ( 1995:330 ) argues affectingly that the discourse doing the pattern of racism anti-Cuban caused clash between the Afro-Cuban soldiers and their white higher-ups, since the former were held to a dual criterion. The discourse against racism was directed against the Afro-Cubans to command their possible political aspirations, but white separationists were non held to the same criterion. Ironically, while Afro-Cuban soldiers fought to make a new Cuban society, the triumphs of the war led to altering commitments of white civil sectors, whose leaders undermined the military & # 8217 ; s authorization and reshaped the war to prefer their ain societal and economic involvements.

After 1896, white plantation owners from the cardinal and western parts together with the autonomists allied with the separationists. Afro-Cubans fought to undo the system of white privilige that had been the trademark of colonial society, but with the alteration in the breakaway leading and the cooptation by the United States, a monolithic reinvestment in the sugar industry occurred and traditional societal hierarchies were reaffirmed under the way of the new colonial power. P? rez ( 1983: eighteen ) asserts that the U.S. intercession of 1898 prevented the ictus of power of the Cuban radical ground forces and reaffirmed the traditional societal hierarchies. As Benedict Anderson ( 1983:160 ) observes, & # 8220 ; One should therefore non be much surprised if radical leadings, consciously or unconsciously, come to play Godhead of the manor. & # 8221 ; What distinguishes the Cuban instance nevertheless, is that the two foremost radical leaders, Maceo and Mart? died in conflict, so we can non cognize whether the societal purposes of the popular motion would hold been realized under their leading to transform Cuban society.

It is of import non to lose sight of the civilian/military division which emerged after Mart? & # 8217 ; s decease because the vision of nationalist integrity espoused within the military ranks differed well from the vision of post-colonial Cuba envisioned by the new annexationist leading of the PRC and the white Cuban, plantation owner elite. However, as has been discussed, positions sing the Afro-Cubans & # 8217 ; function in the revolution was a dissentious issue within the ranks of the white separationists every bit good as a thorny job for vocal Afro-Cubans. The forfeits made by Afro-Cubans in the War of Independence were great because they held a strong vision for a more classless society, reinforced by white radical party propaganda ; nevertheless, their hopes led to disillusionment at the decision of the war with the reimposition of oppressive colonial-style position hierarchies.

Anderson, Benedict 1983. Imagined Communities: Contemplations on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.

Ayala, C? sar 1995. & # 8220 ; Social and Economic Aspects of Sugar Production in Cuba, 1880-1930. & # 8221 ; Latin American Research Review 30 ( 1 ) : 95-124.

Ferrer, Ada 1991. & # 8220 ; Social Aspects of Cuban Nationalism: Race, Slavery and the Guerra Chiquita 1879-1880. & # 8221 ; Cuban Studies 21: 37-56.

1995. To Make a Free State: Race and the Struggle for Independence in Cuba, 1868-1898. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, University of Michigan.

1998. & # 8220 ; Rustic Men, Civilized State: Race, Culture, and Contention on the Eve of Cuban Independence. & # 8221 ; Latino American Historical Review, Forthcoming.

Helg, Aline 1995. Our Rightful Share: The Afro-Cuban Struggle for Equality, 1886-1912. University of North Carolina Press.

Kaplan, Amy 1993. & # 8220 ; Black and Blue on San Juan Hill, & # 8221 ; in Cultures of United States Imperialism, erectile dysfunction. Amy Kaplan and Donald E. Pease, 219-236. Durham: Duke University Press.

P? rez Jr. , Louis A. 1983. Cuba Between Empires, 1878-1902. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Scott, Rebecca J. 1985. & # 8220 ; Class Relations in Sugar and Political Mobilization in Cuba, 1868-1899. & # 8221 ; Cuban Studies 15 ( 1 ) : 15-28.

1994. & # 8220 ; Specifying the Boundaries of Freedom in the World of Cane: Cuba, Brazil, and Louisiana after Emancipation. & # 8221 ; American Historical Review 99 ( 1 ) : 70-102.

Written by

I'm Colleen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out