Viruss are obligate intracellular parasites and, as such, must perforate a suited host cell in order to retroflex their genomes and disseminate. Most viruses are limited to a specific set of cells or tissues in which they can successfully retroflex, and this may be in one or more peculiar species.

When viruses are able to adhere a assortment of cells, the pathogenesis and overall consequence on the being may differ. The chief determiners of viral tropism differ between different virus households, but in order to take the first, and arguably most of import measure, in the infection of a host cell, the virus must attach via specific interactions between cell surface molecules and viral proteins. Enveloped viruses normally have proteins embedded in their envelope, assembled at the host cell surface prior to budding. In the instance of some viruses ( such as HIV-1 ) , these may even dwell of cellular proteins from the host cell itself. Non- enveloped viruses are normally internalized in some manner and uncoated in an endosome in a pH-dependant mode.

Many viruses require a figure of cell surface receptors for cell entry, and it is this combination, added to other factors such as reproduction proteins, that determine whether or non a virus can perforate and retroflex within a certain cell.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Initial phases of infection

Introduction

As obligate intracellular parasites, the life rhythm of viruses depends on an intracellular reproduction stage and they are therefore dependent on life cells.

The first indispensable interaction a virus makes with a host cell is with a cell-surface receptor. A viral receptor may be defined as any cell surface constituent that mediates acknowledgment of a cell and facilitates entry of the virus and subsequent infection. Receptors serve to guarantee infection by get the better ofing repulsive force between the virus and cell. ( Baranowski, Flint, Jindrak, modern virol ) Cellular receptors are by and large proteins, although other types of receptor, such as saccharides, may be used ( see table 1 ) . These molecules are indispensable constituents of the cell or extracellular matrix and maps may include cell adhesion, signalling e.g. chemokine and growing factor receptors. ( Baranowski 2003 ) While some viruses require merely one receptor, adhering to one cellular receptor entirely may non be sufficient for induction of infection for other viruses. Viruss may adhere two or more receptors in sequence in order to originate endocytosis or membrane merger. For some viruses, the first contact with a cell is through a low-affinity interaction with a omnipresent molecule, which allows the primary receptor-virus interaction to take topographic point. The primary receptor is by and large alone to certain cells and hence partially defines the tropism of that peculiar virus, as cells are rendered susceptible to infection by a certain virus if the receptor required for fond regard and entry is present. The primary attachment receptor may bring on a conformational alteration in the viral envelope protein edge, to bring on farther interaction with the cell. ( Modern Virology ) A farther interaction may so be required to originate infection, performed by a coreceptor.The definition of the term “ coreceptor ” may sometimes be equivocal, but by and large, it is taken to be the molecule that induces merger or incursion of a cell. This may be a farther determiner of tropism, for illustration the interaction of HIV-1…

Virus entry into a cell is the first measure in the life0cycle of a virus ; assorted mechanisms of viral cell enrty are shown in figure 1. The mechanism of entry varies between viruses, but all begin with the binding of a cellular receptor by a viral protein. Binding of a cellular receptor may bring on endocytosis or formation of an endosome, the acidic environment of which induces uncoating ; this may be dependent upon cellular proteins clathrin or caveolin. Enveloped viruses may necessitate an acidic environment that will bring on conformational alterations in envelope proteins required to bring on membrane merger, while others, including the rubeolas and HIV viruses, can blend straight with the plasma membrane at impersonal pH. ( Baranowski ) Fusion at the plasma membrane releases the nucelocapsid into the cytol, where the virus can do its manner to the karyon or get down reproduction in the cytol. The differences in these entry tracts are due to the nature of the molecular interactions between the viral constituents and target-cell receptors, for illustration, viruses that mimic the natural ligand of receptors for signalling molecules interefere with their signalling to advance viral entry into the cell and spread of infection. ( Bomsell )

Conformational alterations ensuing from the binding of a primary receptor that allow the binding of a merger receptor are a common mechanism among assorted types of virus, including grippe and HIV type 1, … illustrations and brief description. Similar to Influenza.

Multiple receptors could be coreceptors and move together either to modulate each other or to lend complementary maps. Alternatively, the receptors might move consecutive. Binding of the virus to the first receptor could do alterations in the virus or host that are necessary before the 2nd receptor can adhere ( 50 ) . For those viruses in fluids with flow, such as blood or respiratory secernments, the initial binding must be able to consequence rapid moorage of the virus to its host cell. ( Haywood )

As antecedently stated, some viruses recognise more than one cellular receptor. The same receptor may besides be used by more than one type of virus. ( see table 1 ) Often, these are extremely abundant in many tissues, for illustration, heparan sulphate can function as a receptor for many viruses, including Human immunodefiecieny virus, Hepatitis C and Dengue Virus and as a co-receptor for Herpesviruses ( excepting EBV ) . ( O’Donnel ) CAR, acts as a receptor for both coxsackie and adenoviruses. ( Schneider ) Table 1 illustrates the diverseness of cell surface molecules which viruses have adapted to recognize. Some viruses use more than one type of molecule as a primary receptor e.g. reoviruses bind to the beta-adrenergic receptor every bit good as NAN. ( Flint )

Table 1:

Receptor

Function/Distribution

Virus

Heparan sulfate medieties of preoteoglycans

Sugar Derivative

HSV, CMV, BHV, vaccina virus, Human adenovirus, Dengue Virus, Yellow Fever Virus, AAv2, Sindbis Virus, HPV, FMDV,

3-O- sulfated heparan sulphate

Sugar Derivative

Herpes simplex 1

Cluster of differentiation 4

HIV-1, HIV-2, SIV

CXCR4

Cell adhesion protein

HIV-1

Car

Human adenovirus, coxsackie virus B1-6

N-Acetyl-9-0-acetylneuraminic acid ( sialic acid ) residues on glycoproteins or gangliosides

Sugar Derivative

Human grippe virus, coronavirus

Integrins

Human adenovirus ( I±vI?3 and I±vI?5 ) , Human rotavirus, echovirus, Coxaskie virus A9 ( I±vI?3 ) , Human paraechovirus adenovirus ( I±vI?3 and I±vI?1 )

Membrane cofactor protein ( CD46 )

Measless Virus

MHC category I

Human adenovirus

Nectin-1 ( HveC )

Nectin-2 ( HveB )

Jam

Reovirus type 1 and 2

CD46

Complement control protein

rubeolas

ICAM-1

Rhinoviruss ( major group )

Acetylcholine Receptor

Rabiess

While the presence of certain receptors on host cells is critical to originate infection, these interactions are non ever sufficient to explicate all facets of cell, tissue and species tropism. ( Flint ) ( Haywood, Schneider ) Binding of a viral protein to a cell surface receptor does non needfully intend a productive infection will follow, since a co-receptor may be absent or functional spheres of the receptor may be blocked. ( Baranowski ) Absence of specific cytoplasmatic or atomic molecules may impede the reproduction of some viruses, despite their permissivity. However, even a non-productive infection may bring on infective effects, for illustration, adhering to specific receptor may bring on the secernment of cytokines. ( Schneider ) A virus by and large can non infect a cell successfully in the absence of its specific receptor, so the distribution around the organic structure of the receptor will move as a limitation on the scope of tissues that can be infected and therefore on the figure of systems in the organic structure where marks and symptoms of infection might be experienced. ( Flint )

In the true sense of the word, Tropism refers to the specific cells a peculiar virus is able to retroflex in, although the usage of receptor by a virus is progressively a valid definition in the field of virology. Extra factors the cause viral tropism will non be considered in the context of this essay, although they may be mentioned briefly where relevant, since the focal point of this reappraisal is the nexus between specific receptor use and virus tropism and pathogenesis. ( Kuhmann )

The primary subjects explored here are the virus-receptor interactions with cells that allow viruses to come in cells and initiate infection and how this relates to the tropism of the virus at a cellular and organismic degree. I am to show how viral fond regard and entry is frequently a complicated multi-step procedure, sometimes necessitating many different cell and virus molecules. The viruses mostly used to exemplify these points, Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 ( HIV-1 ) , Influenza A and Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 ( HSV-1 ) are human viruses of medical significance, but the tropism of these peculiar viruses in other animate beings, along with other viruses specific to other animate beings will be discussed where relevant. The construction and genomic administration of these viruses is irrelevant and is merely discussed where it relates to the glycoproteins that interact with cellular receptors. Viruss of workss, Fungis and bacteriums are non discussed

The presence on the cell surface of a protein that has been identified as the receptor for a given virus may non be sufficient for a productive viral infection, and there may be multiple mechanisms behind such limitations: functional spheres of the receptor may be blocked in some cellular context, extra proteins ( or other cofactors ) may be needed, or cells may exhibit hindrances for completion of the infection rhythm, despite an initial successful interaction with a functional receptor.

( Baranowski 2003 )

comparings

Hiv

Influenza

HSV

Multiple receptors/co receptors

/

/

/

Multiple virus proteins

/

Multiple cell types

/

/

Membrane merger

/

/ ( sarin, soman, H, L )

Proteolytic cleavage/down regulation of receptor

/

/

Omnipresent receptors

/

/

/

annexin

/

/

Hassium

/

/

HSV- Demonstrates how viruses may utilize a big figure of viral proteins and receptors to adhere and come in specific cells. ( Hayashi and Yoon ) and how the interactions are a complex multi-step procedure.

Influenza – multiple stairss. binds many cell types Tropism is dependent on other receptors and interactions. Of the many illustrations, the interaction of

the human grippe A virus hemagglutinin

with N-acetylneuraminic acid, and the ensuing

conformational changes involved

in pH-dependent membrane merger, are one

of the best characterized at the structural

and functional degrees ( 11 ) ( Baranowski 2001 )

illustration of proteolytic cleavage to help spread and pathogenesis.

Conformational alteration required for merger

HIV A well-documented instance of usage of multiple receptos is that of HIV-1 viruses and related viruses. Illustrates how a virus may utilize multiple coreceptors to intercede entry to different types of cells and therefore act upon the tropism of this virus. Uses some of the same receptors as other viruses ( analogues between HIV, HSV and grippe )

Multi-step procedure

Other? Coronavirus, Adeno/coxsackie? LCMV

Figure 1: The generalized stairss of viral entry into a mark cell. Shown are an enveloped and a non-enveloped virus.

The interaction of the virion with the fond regard receptor leads to the first conformational alterations in the envelope proteins.

This measure enables the interaction with co-receptors, or entry go-betweens and farther conformational alterations at the plasma membrane.

In enveloped viruses ( top ) , this may present the energy for the direct merger of the viral envelope and cellular membrane. Some enveloped and non-enveloped viruses require the low pH in acidic endosomes to bring on this conformational alteration. Enveloped viruses may necessitate the low pH to bring on membrane merger ( Centre ) .

These mechanisms lead to the release and perchance uncoating of the virus genome, and the induction of the virus reproduction rhythm.

Role of Viral Receptor Destruction

While non-enveloped viruses typically undergo relase through cytolysis. Influenza and HIV-1 Viruses besides demonstrate the importance of receptor-destroying activity on the infectivity of some viruses. This is imperative for the efficient release and cell-cell spread of the virus by forestalling the glycoproteins on the newly-emerged virus from adhering to the host cell receptors. It is besides of import for forestalling superinfection of cells by the same or different viruses using the same receptor, which may ensue in cell decease. The efficient budding and release of Influenza A virus from the host cell relies on the remotion of Sialic Acid residues by Neuraminidase. In contract, the HIV-1 virus gp120 envelope glycoprotein downregulates the CD4 receptor after infection of monocytes, by exciting TNF-I± production. Other cellular mechanisms contribute to down-modulation of CD4, including the cistron merchandise Nef, which causes CD4 internalization severally. The precursor of gp120 and gp41, gp160, has besides been found to adhere CD4 intracellularly in the presence of viral protein Vpu, ensuing in keeping of CD4 in the Endoplasmic Rectilium.

Enveloped atoms leave the septic cell inconspicuously

by budding and secernment. Nonenveloped viruses

are normally thought to undergo release through cell lysis,

but some may get away by secretory mechanisms after

budding into membrane edge compartments and so

losing their membrane ( Altenburg et al. , 1980 ) . Others

may overthrow cellular autophagy tracts to derive entree

to exocytic cell organs ( Jackson et al. , 2005 ) .

( Marsh )

Written by
admin
x

Hi!
I'm Colleen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out