, Research PaperAdult Crimes Deserve Adult TreatmentThursday, May 21, 1998. In Springfield, Oregon, 15-year old Kip Kinkel opened fire in the cafeteriaof Thurston High School. Two were killed and 25 others were wounded.
Tuesday, March 24, 1998. InJonesboro, Arkansas, 11-year old Andrew Golden and 13-year old Mitchell Johnson pulled the firedismay and shooting at the pupils registering out of the school. Five were killed and ten were wounded.Monday, Dec. 1, 1997. In Paducah, Kentucky, 14-year old Michael Carneal pulled out a handgun andbegan firing on a pupil supplication group. Three were killed and five others were wounded.These incidents are merely a bantam sample of the school shots that have been committed by juvnilesin the United States.
More shots have happenned in Onalaska, Washington ; Johnston, RhodeIsland ; Endinboro, Pennsylvania ; St. Charles, Missouri & # 8230 ; the list continues on and on, non to advertColumbine!Lynbrook junior Stephanie Tsai disagrees with this stating, & # 8220 ; At the age of 18, teens are allowed toballot because people believe that by that age they can believe rationally and sensibally. Until childs are18, they can non be held responsible for their actions. & # 8221 ; Let & # 8217 ; s analyze this age 18 issue more closely & # 8230 ;Granted, our or society does give juvniles the right to vote at age 18. However, many provinces give themthe right to drive at age 16 and the right to imbibe at age 21. The fact is that declaring an 18 year-old angrownup is an arbitrary criterion to find adulthood every bit far as prosecuting offense goes.
The juvenile tribunal system was orginially implemented to protect juveniles from the & # 8220 ; rough & # 8221 ; grownuptribunal, for juvenile felons were thought to be more mentally & # 8220 ; immature & # 8221 ; than grownups. This may reallygood be if we were talking of a 6 year-old. However, 17 year-olds classify as juveniles as good.
Arvitamin Ewe to state that 17 year-olds are significantly more & # 8220 ; immature & # 8221 ; and should & # 8220 ; non be held rsponsible fortheir actions & # 8221 ; than that of an grownup 18-year old? I wonder & # 8230 ; & # 8230 ; ..Furthermore, if our justness system uses mental incompetence as the ground juveniles have their ainseparate and more indulgent tribunal, why aren & # 8217 ; t 40 year-olds with the head of a 10 year-old prosecuted inthe juvenile justness system? Are they non mentally & # 8220 ; immature & # 8221 ; as good?An wrong premise about this controversial affair is if the juvenile were to be prosecuted in thegrownup tribunal, he would be condemned with an grownup sentence. The same goes for juvniles. If a 15 year-old were genuinely mentally immature, the grownup justness system would take that fact into history of itsdetermination and opinion.While others may reason that the juvenile justness system has the juvenile & # 8217 ; s best involvements in head,basic freedoms such as due procedure are denied in the juvenile tribunals. While those prosecutedin grownup tribunals are entitled to a jury, juvenile sentences normally lay in the custodies of an single justice.
The simple fact is that to the full competent and mature juveniles are to the full capable of perpetrating the sameoffense as a competent grownup. The consequences of the offense are the same. In burglary, an guiltless individual wasrobbed of his posessions. In slaying, an guiltless individual was robbed of his life. As Katrina Ng, SantaClara University fresher answered, & # 8220 ; If they commit the grownup offenses, they should pay the grownupeffects. It & # 8217 ; s non as if they don & # 8217 ; t know the difference between right and wrong.
& # 8221 ;And even in the extreme instances where right and incorrect were identical to the immaturejuvenile, the grownup justness system would be better equipped to prosecute him, leting for extenuatingfortunes and giving due procedure. This manner, justness is best achieved & # 8211 ; on both sides.