Should The Electoral College Be Reformed? Essay, Research PaperThe organic structure that elects the presidents and vice-presidents of the United States is known as the electoral college. Article 2, Section I, of the Constitution provides that each province & # 8220 ; shall name & # 8221 ; as many presidential voters as the province has members of Congress. ( Three is the smallest figure of voters a province may hold, since every province has two senators and at least one member of the House of Representatives. ) The Constitution gives the legislative assembly of each province the authorization to make up one’s mind how that province & # 8217 ; s presidential voters are chosen, and every province has provided that the voters shall be straight elected by the electors. After the voters have been chosen, they meet in their several province capitals to project their ballots. The lone constitutional limitation is that an voter may vote for merely one campaigner who is a occupant of the same province as that of the voter ; this reflects the original premise that the voters would exert a pick. The Electoral College represented a via media among the laminitiss of the United States about how to elect a main executive.
The Constitution Convention, which wrote the Constitution of the United States and convened in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787, considered more than 15 different proposals, including programs for election by Congress or one of its houses, by assorted province functionaries, by direct popular election, or by today & # 8217 ; s system of electoral college. James Madison andGovernor Morris were among those whose favored a direct popular election by the people. Supporters of the direct election method argued that it had worked good in some provinces to elect a governor, would set up the independency and high quality of the president, and was the most appropriate method for a democratic authorities. However, critics of the thought, such as Elbridge Gerry, doubted the capacity of public to take its leader sagely, and worried about the & # 8220 ; ignorance of the people.
& # 8221 ; George Mason thought the enormousness of the state would preventvoters from cognizing adequate pertinent information about possible campaigners to take intelligently. For old ages, the Electoral College has been a favourite mark for political reformists. Critics typically raise several points. First, many argue that the establishment is undemocratic, particularly since it could take to the election of a president and frailty president who received fewer popular ballots than their oppositions.
Such a consequence, some contend, would be unjust and might non beaccepted as legitimate by the populace. On 16 occasions, a campaigner has won an electoral bulk though having less than 50 per centum of the popular ballot. In fact, on several occasions, the Electoral College has awarded the presidential term to a campaigner who lost the popular ballot. For case, in 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes ( 185-184 ) achieved an electoral bulk, although Samuel J. Tilden won a popular bulk ( 50.9 % , compared to Hayes & # 8217 ; s 47.9 % ) .
In 1888, Benjamin Harrison ( 233-168 ) won the presidential term, although Grover Cleveland won the popular ballot, by a border of less than one per centum ( 48.6 % & # 8211 ; 48.3 % ) . Critics besides express concern about the deficiency of answerability of voters, because they are largely anon. persons, non the high individuals that the laminitiss envisioned them to be, Although they are chosen by province parties to back up peculiar campaigners, on juncture they have non done so, thereby making concern about the irresponsible voter. Critics besides complain that the Electoral College system is undemocratic in a 2nd regard, because it & # 8216 ; weighs & # 8217 ; the ballots of some Americans more than others. Since each province has at least three electoral ballots irrespective of population, smaller provinces have a higher ratio voters to population than do larger provinces.
On the other manus, the winner-take-all characteristic that the stateshave superimposed on the system tends to amplifythe importance of electors in the larger provinces. A campaigner who wins California by one popular ballots wins 54 electoral ballots ; a campaigner winning in Delaware merely gets three. In bend, campaigners have ground to perpetrate disproportional clip and resources to, and orient their platforms to the positions of electors in, the largest provinces, therebyheightening the influence of groups concentrated in the big industrial provinces. Finally, agreements for contingent election by the House of representatives and Senate raise some concerns. The House and Senate might elect a president and frailty president and frailty president from different parties, leting a dead end and allowing the Speaker of the House to move as president under the current presidential sequence jurisprudence. Reformers have proposed assorted redresss for these perceived defects.
They range from get rid ofing the full establishment wholly and taking a president and frailty president from direct popular ballot to the more modest proposal to retain the Electoral College votes with the general ticket and winner-take-all characteristics but extinguish the single voters. Intermediate proposals include taking voters in territories in each province instead than statewide or choosingthem under a system of relative representation However, guardians of the Electoral College suggest that the reforms would either sabotage of import rules of American democracy or cause unintended effects. They argue that the establishment has by and large worked good for two centuries.
Not merely has the receiver of the most popular ballots about ever won an electoral bulk, but the Electoral College normally produces a proportionally greater border than does the popular ballot. For illustration, in John F. Kennedy & # 8217 ; s official 0.1 per centum popular border in 1960 translated into a big 303 to 219 electoral triumph. This inclination non merely contributes to the authorization of the new president but besides alleviates, to some extent, the demand to tell all ballots in elections that are close. Consequently, the Electoral College contributes to the ability of American presidential elections to bring forth a clear consequence, non uncertainness Furthermore, protagonists of the Electoral contend that all visions of democracy do non necessitate that the party with the most ballots win control.
The House or Senate, they point out, might be controlled by a party whose campaigners jointly received fewer ballots than their oppositions. Nor does democracy ever require that all ballots be weighted every bit. For illustration, the ballot of a individual in a little province assumes greater significance in electing a United States senator than it does that of a individual in a big province. Nor is it needfully a job that the Electoral College favours bulks in big industrial provinces. In portion, our constitutional agreements are designed to protect minorities from bulk control. Other values are besides portion of our constitutional construction, such as federalism and protecting minority involvements, which the Electoral College system arguably assists. Defenders of the Electoral College besides contend that it helps safeguard the bipartisan system. The winner-take-all characteristic makes it hard for 3rd parties to win electoral ballots.
A party that could command 15 to 20 per centum of the ballot equally distributed across the provinces would have no electoral ballot equally distributed across the provinces would have no electoral ballots andaccordingly would hold less incentive to run and small entreaty to possible protagonists. In bend, the establishment has inhibited the formation of ideological or splinter parties and has encouraged the endurance of the bipartisan system, a characteristic that lends stableness and coherence to American political relations. Despite the possible jobs and contention environing the electoral college, it is improbable that either now or in the close hereafter the fundamental law will be amended to alter this 200 twelvemonth old job.