A Multinational corporation ( MNC ) is an endeavor or corporation which controls production or distributes services in minimal two states. Multinational corporations by and large have commanding control over local economic systems and international dealingss. Multinational corporations are playing really of import portion in globalisation. Technology and imaginative potencies are chief causes of aggressive strength for houses. Today, the development states are constructing their potencies through foreign direct investing ( FDI ) of transnational corporations. But the inquiry is do transnational corporations truly reassign engineering? ( Zhao Z. et Al. n.d. ) .
The significance of International Technology Transfer for fiscal growing can hardly be overstated. Both the attainment of engineering and its scattering promote productiveness growing. Since invention and creative activity procedures stay awesomely, most developing states should trust to a great extent on imported engineerings for advanced productive cognition. Though, important sum of modernisation and change happen in these states, they pattern successfully driven technological transmutation in developing states. ( Evenson et al. 1995 )
Importance of Technology Transfer
In today ‘s international economic growing, the nexus is connected between foreign direct investing ( FDI ) and engineering transportations, by transnational corporations and it seems to be really high-flying. There is a one position which tells that engineering can be transferred for hosting developing economic systems during,
- MNC ‘s dorsum and progress linkages with autochthonal clients and houses
- Simulation of local houses by in the being of MNCs
- Stimulation of directors and trained workers by MNCs
- Transportation of R & A ; D activities of MNCs ‘ to host economic systems. ( Zhao Z. et Al. n.d. ) .
On the 2nd idea, sometimes it ‘s recommended that MNCs should,
- Continue their technological betterment by implementing host economic systems to prosecute rigorous regulations of rational belongings rights.
- Control engineering scattering to their abroad subordinates
- Favor cardinal constituent imports to local providers from parent mills to cut down linkage effects
- Relocate engineerings which are unsuitable for host state ( Zhao Z. et Al. n.d. ) .
Some economic experts argue that the engineering transportation from MNCs is non helpful for developing states because MNCs apply capital intensive technique but developing states have limited capital and they are rich in labour so the engineering transportation is of really modest usage. The MNCs besides increase competition which can be awful for domestic industries as there may be merely few tough domestic participants who can do a mansion with the planetary giants. If you take the skilled individual ‘s prospective, MNCs give higher wages to them. No uncertainty MNCs fetch foreign capital to the developing states but this capital becomes the beginning of refund as a net income to MNC ‘s parent states and finally, the capital of developing state goes to MNC ‘s parent state. ( Zhao Z. et Al. n.d. ) .
The Factors That Will Be Beneficial For the Host Developing Country
Problem of Asymmetric Information
Technology transportation occupies information exchange between those who had it and those who had n’t. The earlier ca n’t unwrap the cognition wholly without leveling the beginning for trade which resulted in to a good known job called job of asymmetric information. Buyers ca n’t make up one’s mind the information value wholly without purchasing it which can be resulted into immense dealing costs. In international position, information crisis are more barbarous with contract enforcements, more complex to acquire. The transnational houses set up foreign subordinates as it ‘s hard to utilize markets for net incomes from proprietary engineerings. ( Hoekman B. et Al 2004 )
New engineerings proprietors have important market power because of lead clip, patents and IPRs. This basically means that the engineering monetary value will travel beyond socially optimum degree. This divergence between cost and monetary value gives opportunity to do net income to the pioneers. It means a lessening in national benefit of importing engineerings. ( Hoekman B. et Al 2004 )
If engineering benefits and costs of exchange are non wholly internalized by those who concerned, chief benefits to host states from International Technology Transfer are expected to go on from unsalaried spillovers. Positive spillovers survive when technological information is elusive into broad economic system. The engineering supplier ca n’t take out the economic value from this scattering. Spillovers can happen from FDI, licensing, motion of people, simulation and trade. These market failures involve policies to magnify public assistance through encouraging International Technology Transfer. To be effectual, the policy must set the private agents ‘ inducements that hold imaginative engineerings in right manner. ( Hoekman B. et Al 2004 )
Foreign Direct Investment
FDI may offer more capable foreign engineerings to the development states which may ensue in greater competition and technological spillovers. In accretion to exhibition effects, spillovers may go on because of perpendicular linkages and labour turnover as MNEs transmit engineering to adjacent houses which are intermediates providers of their end product. Case surveies have shown that considerable engineering scattering happens due to FDI ( Blomstrom and Kokko, 1997 ) . Econometric surveies are used to be more diverse so some determination of houses with a reasonably high MNE being probably to be more fruitful ( Kokko 9 et Al, 1997 ) , whereas others find that internally-held houses may make inferiorbecause of the foreign industry presence ( e.g. , Aitken and Harrison, 1997 ) . Harmful spillover effects can go on in short tally if MNEs draw off local demand. Straight up engineering displacement from MNEs to place providers is documented to originate in the class of houses of industrialised states who buy the Asiatic houses end product to sell beneath their ain trade names. This type of dealingss may outcome as proficient information transportations from foreign purchasers. ( Blomstrom and Kokko, 1997 )
Licensing is really of import resource for developing states of International Technology Transfer ( Correa 2003 ) . They normally occupy production purchase or distribution rights with implicit in proficient know-how. The determinations on how to acquire license are like to those refering FDI. The factors which affect the licensing flows are ability to direct back licensing rents, awaited growing, human capital stock, investing clime, market size and propinquity. Host economic system is another factor which is buoyant of licensor houses which proprietary engineerings wo n’t get away into. To some extent the transferred engineerings can be easy copied because industrial intelligence is really common. When it ‘s non possible, the houses choose non to come in in licencing race or to reassign lagging engineerings ( Maskus, 2000, Saggi, 1996 ) . Successful transportation normally needs ability to larn and put to transport out engineerings to production procedures. That ‘s the ground why states who had important technology accomplishments with R & A ; D plans, grosss greater licensing flows. ( Yang and Maskus, 2001 ) .
Motion of Peoples
Very modest consideration is given to labour turnover in International Technology Transfer channel. Though some surveies are at that place of intra-national labour but turnover of MNEs to place houses is limited whereas others find the contrary ( Rhee, 1990 ) . Mexico ‘s maquiladorasector is good illustration for perpendicular International Technology Transfer. Most maquiladoras start as secondary houses of US houses which are shifted to Mexico for labour-intensive. After some clip, maquiladoras taken up more complicated production techniques, many of so were brought in from US ( Saggi, 2002 ) . Similar consequences pertain to passage economic systems, see for example, Smarzynska ( 2002 ) . In instance of intra-firm International Technology Transfer, MNE keeps proprietary control of know-how. In states wheresoever local houses more capable and near to MNEs in footings of proficient and labour footings, turnover is more likely. So, the capableness of place houses to take up new engineerings is a make up one’s minding factor of labour turnover. The profitableness of doing new companies is an extra factor ( Saggi, 2002 ) . International motion from people related with subjects working or analyzing overseas for narrow period or the interior advancement of foreign subjects in state is one more possible ground for International Technology Transfer. The chief trial for developing states is to help momentarymovement overseas and to back up returnees to take on local concern and research development. ( Saggi, 2002 )
International Technology Transfer flows rely on many facets like competition conditions, administration, growing, human capital footing, substructure, propinquity to markets and size. Most of these facets are influenced by policy. It ‘s really hard to make up one’s mind the best policy for maximising International Technology Transfer. Although an copiousness of research on International Technology Transfer, there is much vacillation about the grade of market failures. The on-going analysis has identified some pollex regulations for policy engagement with a position to bettering growing results and figure of precise proposals. ( Saggi, 2002 )
After discoursing diverse characteristics of MNCs for developing states, the large inquiry is what function these MNCs drama in developing states, positive or negative? Normally what happens is that the developing states authoritiess do n’t keep any control on these MNCs, which is the major blooper really. It ‘s true that MNCs can be really utile for developing states but merely when, there is sufficient sum of control over them by the authoritiess. The authoritiess should n’t give incentives to MNCs merely because they come from developed states. MNCs should besides hold same regulations and conditions as domestic industries have in the development states.
Aitken, B.J. and A.E. Harrison ( 1999 ) . .Do domestic houses benefit from direct foreign investing? Evidence from Venezuela. , American Economic Review, 89, 605.618.
Blomstrom, Magnus and Ari Kokko ( 1997 ) , .How Foreign Investment Affects Host Countries.
Correa, Carlos M. ( 2003 ) , “ Can the TRIPS Agreement Foster Technology Transfer to Developing States? ” Duke University, manuscript.
Evenson et Al. ( 1995 ) , “ Technological Change and Technology
Scheme, ” in Hollis Chenery and T.N. Srinivasan, editors, Handbook of DevelopmentEconomics: Vol. 3 ( Amsterdam: North-Holland ) .
Hoekman Bernard M, Maskus Keith E, Saggi Kamal ( 2004 ) Transportation of Technology to Developing States: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options [ Online ] . Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.colorado.edu/IBS/pubs/pec/pec2004-0003.pdf [ Accessed on 9 March 2010 ] .
Kokko, Ari, Ruben Tansini, and Mario Zejan ( 1997 ) . .Trade Regimes and Spillover Effects of FDI: Evidence From Uruguay, Stockholm School of Economics, Roneo.
Maskus, Keith E. and John S. Wilson, Editors ( 2001 ) , Quantifying the Impact of TechnicalBarriers to Trade: Can It Be Done? ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ) .
Maskus, Keith E. ( 2000 ) , Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy ( Washington DC: Institute for International Economics ) . 33
Rhee, Yung Whee ( 1990 ) , .The Catalyst Model of Development: Lessons from Bangladesh ‘s Success with Garment Exports, . World Development 18: 333-346.
Saggi, Kamal ( 1996 ) , .Entry into a Foreign Market: Foreign Direct Investment versus Licensing, . Review of International Economics 4: 99-104.
Saggi, Kamal ( 2002 ) , .Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer: A Survey, . World Bank Research Observer 17, 191-235.
Smarzynska, Beata K. ( 2002 ) , .Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment through Backward and Forward Linkages: The Case of Lithuania, . World Bank, Roneo.
Yang, Guifang and Keith E. Maskus ( 2001 ) , “ Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing: An Econometric Probe, ” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137: 58-79.
Zhao Zhongxiu, Zhang Kevin Honglin, [ No Date ] Multinational Corporations and Technology Transfers in Developing States: Evidence from China [ Online ] Available at hypertext transfer protocol: //faculty.washington.edu/karyiu/confer/beijing06/papers/zhao-zhang.pdf