Adolescent Abortion Essay, Research Paper

1

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Research Paper

ENG 232/Dr. Powers

27 Mar 99

TEEN ABORTION

It is dry that, while a adolescent miss must obtain parental consent for such a minor process as holding her ears pierced, for her to put her life on the line ( every bit good as that of her unborn kid ) and obtain an abortion, no parental presentment is required. If a adolescent, because of her immatureness and rawness in decision-making, may non inscribe herself in the school of her pick without her parent? s signature and consent, how can she be expected to independently come to a determination sing such a serious issue as whether to obtain an abortion?

It is besides strikingly dry that the same parents who would be required by jurisprudence to supply drawn-out fiscal and medical aid to the kid, if any facet of the abortion went amiss and left her, say, paralytic or comatose? and the same parents who could be required by jurisprudence to back up an infant Born of their kid ( if the adolescent did non elect to secure an abortion ) ? these same parents are non themselves protected by jurisprudence to help the kid in make up one’s minding whether to even transport the baby to term. Parental consent or presentment should be required for abortions for bush leagues.

Pettigrew 2

Surveies have indicated that the effects of abortion upon striplings are greater than effects upon grownups ( Gillham, 1997 ) . These processs are really hazardous to any female. Complications to the female parent occur in one of four grownup legal abortions ; among striplings the hazard increases well to one in three. Further, the fact that 2 to 5 per centum of abortions result in asepsis might non upset a adult female in her 30s, but it could hold lay waste toing effects upon a immature adolescent? s relationships and future programs for matrimony ( Gillham ) . So, to state that parents would screen their kids from irreparable hurting and injury is non unreasonable.

Contrary to public idea, there is no such thing as a? safe? abortion. Approximately 258 physical complications can happen in an induced abortion, including bleeding ; daze ; encephalon harm ; blood poisoning ; intellectual, cardiac or pneumonic intercalation ( Gall, 1992 ) . Harmonizing to a survey on induced adolescent abortions, published by the School of Social Welfare at the University of California, stripling? s experience deeply marked psychological effects in the abortion wake ( SSWUC, 1995 ) . Severe depression, shouting enchantments, monolithic societal backdown and even suicide, among other symptoms, have been cited as straight associating to teen? s abortion. No parents would desire to see their girl in that province of head.

Pettigrew 3

One manner or another, parents are involved in fiscal issues that arise from adolescent abortions. For illustration, a minor kid had an illegal abortion two twenty-four hours ago. Her parents were non informed. The minor kid starts to hold complications from the abortions, now medical attending is needed. She? s rushed to the infirmary, and while there the parents are being asked what happened. They can non reply because they don? T know what happened to their kid. Now, because the kid is a minor the parents are stuck with the infirmary measures. Therefore, the same parents that are being held responsible for the incurred fiscal duties merit to be notified when an of import determination refering their minor kid, to hold an abortion, is determined. One proviso of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 requires that for a minor to obtain an abortion, the informed consent of one of her parents must be obtained. It besides provides for a judicial beltway option if the child does non desire to or can non obtain a parent? s consent. ( Tatalovich, 1997 ) .

Parents have a moral, legal, and ethical ground to keep up to their duties refering their minor kid. In the State of California a? kid? means a individual under the age of 18 old ages ( CPC, 1995 ) . Any individual holding the attention or detention of a kid, wilfully causes or permits the kid wellness to be placed in a endangered state of affairs, as proscribed by Section 11165.3,

Pettigrew 4

California Penal Code, including the knowing failure to supply equal nutrient, vesture, shelter, or medical attention is pretermiting the kid ( CPC, 1998 ) . Since parents can be held apt for state of affairss such as those mentioned above, parents should be consented refering their minor kids holding abortions.

Adolescents, nevertheless, are capable to province Torahs ; in 25 provinces, a child can non seek an abortion with out parental consent. While vulnerable to moral disapprobation, and even torment, grownup adult females have the protection of broad statute law in seeking an abortion ( in Roe v. Wade, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that abortion is a constitutional right ) .

Traditionally, any medical intervention of a minor requires parental consent, and as the Planned Parenthood Fact sheet? Adolescents, Abortion, and authorities Intrusion Laws?

point out, a physician handling a child without parental consent is perpetrating the common jurisprudence civil wrong of battery ( PPFA, 1992 ) . However, except? in the country of abortion, there have ne’er been condemnable punishments for handling a child on her ain consent. ?

Most minor kids should trust on their parents for moral support when covering with issues of abortion. When job of abortion issues overshadows kids, the kid should be able

Pettigrew 5

to looks for moral support from their parents. Children love to depend on their parents for merely about anything.

Issues of whether a minor needs parental consent to obtain an abortion was one of the earliest issues to make the Supreme Court after Roe. In 1976, in Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, the Court held that Torahs necessitating parental consent were unconstitutional because they delegated to parents an arbitrary veto power over the minor? s determination. However, the

Court hinted that provinces could necessitate parental consent for bush leagues who were excessively immature to do the determination.

In 1979, instance of Bellotti v. Baird, Court determinations affirmed that provinces may by and large necessitate parental consent every bit long as they provide a process whereby child may use to a justice for a release of the demand. The justice must relinquish the demand if the child is mature plenty to make up one’s mind on the abortion on her ain or if an abortion would be in her best involvement.

In 1990, in the instance of Hodgson v. Minnesota, the Court extended the principle of the parental consent instances to Torahs that require notice to both of a minor? s parents. The Court ruled that provinces may non necessitate presentment of both parents without supplying an alternate manner for mature bush leagues to obtain a

Pettigrew 6

release. The Court left open ; nevertheless, whether Torahs that require notice to merely one parent must supply an option.

Oppositions of presentment Torahs argue that, as a practical affair, they provide an chance for parents to forestall their girls from obtaining an abortion. Besides, that bush leagues who are afraid to affect their parents will detain seeking abortion, seek them in other provinces, or seek illegal abortions. More than 30 provinces have enacted Torahs necessitating parental consent or presentment. Approximately 22 have Torahs with a release mechanism in consequence for mature or? best involvements? bush leagues ( Tatalovich, 1997 ) .

Despite more restrictive statute law, teenage abortions have declined since 1980. Harmonizing to the 1994 study Sex and America? s Teenagers, ? Fewer teens are going pregnant, and in recent old ages, fewer pregnant teens have chosen to hold an abortion? ( Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1994 ) . In 1992 in the U.S. , there were about 308,000 adolescent abortions, which amounts to about 40 % of gestations ( excepting abortions among adolescents. In general, 61 % of teenage abortions are performed with the cognition of at least one parent, and the informed parents largely support their girl? s determination to hold an abortion ( PPFA, 1992 ) .

Pettigrew 7

Work Cited

Beckwith, Francis J. , and Louis P. Pojman. The

Abortion Controversy: 25 Old ages after

Roe v. Wade. 2nd erectile dysfunction. Wadsworth: California,

1998.

California Penal Codes. Compact Ed. Occidents: California, 1995

Cummingss, Brenda. ? Who gets abortions. ? U.S. News & A ;

World Report 19 Jan. 1998: 26-32.

Gall, Susan B. , and Jerome Kagan, eds. The Gale

Encyclopedia of Childhood & A ; Adolescence. New

York: Ablex, 1992.

Gillham, Bill. The Facts about Teenage Pregnancies.

Virginia, 1997.

Hern, Warren M. Abortion Practice. Philadelphia: J.B.

Lippincott, 1984.

? Induced Adolescent Abortions. ? ( Study of the School of Social

Welfare. ) Journal of the American Medical Association

274, no. 1, November 5, 1995: 72-76.

Klassel, D. ( 1993 ) Abortion. In Encyclopedia of Marriage

and the Family ( Vol. 2. 1-12 ) . New York: Macmillan

? Compulsory Parental Consent to Abortion. ? ( Report of the

American Medical Association? s Council on Ethical

And Judicial Affairs. ) Journal of the American

Medical Association 269, no. 1, January 6, 1993: 82-86.

Sexual activity and America? s Teenagers. New York: Alan Guttmacher

Institute, 1994.

Tatalovich, Raymond. The Politics of Abortion in the

United States and Canada: A Comparative Study.

New York: Sharpe, 1997.

? Adolescents, Abortion, and Government Intrusion Laws. ?

( Planned Parenthood Fact sheet ) . New York: Planned

Parenthood Federation of America, October 1992.

Pettigrew 8

Cases

Bellotti v. Baird 443 U.S. 622 ( 1979 ) .

Hodgson v. Minnesota 497 U.S. 297 ( 1980 ) .

Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth 428

U.S. 52 ( 1976 )

Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 ( 1973 ) .

9d5

Work Cited

Beckwith, Francis J. , and Louis P. Pojman. The

Abortion Controversy: 25 Old ages after

Roe v. Wade. 2nd erectile dysfunction. Wadsworth: California,

1998.

California Penal Codes. Compact Ed. Occidents: California, 1995

Cummingss, Brenda. ? Who gets abortions. ? U.S. News & A ;

World Report 19 Jan. 1998: 26-32.

Gall, Susan B. , and Jerome Kagan, eds. The Gale

Encyclopedia of Childhood & A ; Adolescence. New

York: Ablex, 1992.

Gillham, Bill. The Facts about Teenage Pregnancies.

Virginia, 1997.

Hern, Warren M. Abortion Practice. Philadelphia: J.B.

Lippincott, 1984.

? Induced Adolescent Abortions. ? ( Study of the School of Social

Welfare. ) Journal of the American Medical Association

274, no. 1, November 5, 1995: 72-76.

Klassel, D. ( 1993 ) Abortion. In Encyclopedia of Marriage

and the Family ( Vol. 2. 1-12 ) . New York: Macmillan

? Compulsory Parental Consent to Abortion. ? ( Report of the

American Medical Association? s Council on Ethical

And Judicial Affairs. ) Journal of the American

Medical Association 269, no. 1, January 6, 1993: 82-86.

Sexual activity and America? s Teenagers. New York: Alan Guttmacher

Institute, 1994.

Tatalovich, Raymond. The Politics of Abortion in the

United States and Canada: A Comparative Study.

New York: Sharpe, 1997.

? Adolescents, Abortion, and Government Intrusion Laws. ?

( Planned Parenthood Fact sheet ) . New York: Planned

Parenthood Federation of America, October 1992.

Written by
admin
x

Hi!
I'm Colleen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out