The Odyssey Essay, Research Paper
In book 12 of The Odyssey, the chief character, Odysseus, is confronted with three obstructions that he and his crew must suppress in order to acquire place to Ithaca. The first of the three obstructions that Odysseus and his crew must confront are the Sirens and their enchanting tune. This obstruction is the easiest 1 for the war heroes to suppress, all they have to make is stop up their ears and canvas past the Siren & # 8217 ; s island. Odysseus adds a turn by holding himself tied to the mast of his ship where he can here the vocal, but can non be drawn to his decease. After the Sirens Odysseus and his work forces merely have to confront one of the two following obstructions: the monster Scylla, or the natural phenomenon Kharybdis. Before Odysseus and his work forces made their journey through these obstructions Odysseus was forewarned of the dangers in front. Alternatively of informing his work forces of their possible decease, he kept his cognition to himself. In the moral criterions that people use in the late 20th century, Odysseus & # 8217 ; determination non to state his crew about the dangers that lay in front of them was unethical. However, in the criterions of Greece in Odysseus & # 8217 ; clip period it more than probably was a moral action. Knowing both of these facts, how should we, as readers, interpret Odysseus & # 8217 ; determination?
Odysseus made his determination because he believed that his crew would non travel through the drops that house Scylla and Kharybdis. Odysseus was likely right in his judgement of his work forces & # 8217 ; s willingness to confront decease. As the commanding officer he has the right to do determinations of this quality. The
thought of a commanding officer holding the ability to make up one’s mind whether or non the crew lives is another moral issue. Personally, I’m non certain what the regulations sing this are in the United States’ armed forces today. Besides what our armed forces think, I don’t think that the thought of a commanding officer holding the sort of authorization to make up one’s mind whom dies and who lives is moral.
Besides the thought that Odysseus, as a commanding officer, has the authorization to make up one’s mind the destiny of his crew, there is the issue of the grounds behind his determination. I believe that he based his determination to set his crew & # 8217 ; s lives at hazard on his ain demand to acquire place to Ithaca. Therefore, harmonizing to Odysseus & # 8217 ; logic, he wants to travel home much more than his work forces because he thought that his crew would abandon the ship if he told them of their destiny. Whereas he is willing to confront the dangers of the obstructions in front in order to acquire place. To me this is a selfish determination on the portion of Odysseus, to give his crew, or some of it, so that he can acquire place.
In decision, Odysseus made a determination non to state his crew about the dangers that lay in front of them based on several things. He thought that they would decline to confront decease because they didn & # 8217 ; t think that acquiring place was deserving the hazard. He had the right to make this because he was their commanding officer. Still, no affair which moral system you look through, yesteryear or nowadays, Odysseus did non state his crew about the dangers they would confront due to personal grounds. He didn & # 8217 ; t state his crew that six, possibly even more of them, would decease all because he wanted to travel place to Ithaca.