In Vietnam. everyone surveies literature. and their instructors give them many subjects viz. discuss folk literature. verse form. and written literature. In high school. I wrote the essay about discoursing the common people literature that the subject was: “Explain the folk-song of Vietnam: failure is the female parent of success. ” From this essay. I will analyse it and demo the difference between Vietnam essay and America essay. Annameses have the many sorts of the literature. which have the different manner to discourse. Now I will analyse the common people literature to demo the difference between the Vietnam assignment and the United States assignment. First. when my Vietnamese instructors gave the subject for me. they wanted me to cognize about the value of humanitarianism. and lending to the formation of a human sense. Follow Vietnamese people. the value of humanitarianism is the good words with great thoughts in the life. and it makes people beautiful about idea and perceptual experience. Based on the value of humanitarianism. I can happen how to be a good individual?
How I can populate good with the good behaviour? Furthermore. I can develop about a human sense. which is the feeling. the cognition. and the will of people. The subject was involved in the talk of ascendant. thanks to that this would develop my cognition. and my will to do my life better. This is the ground why my Vietnamese instructors gave this subject. When I wrote this essay. my instructor said. “You merely give the one site of failure. and you need to compose more about what you learn from this sentence. ” I merely give the value of failure in the one facet. I do non advert it in general. so I can non analyse about the direct thought. and the deeply thought in the subject. likewise the narrative about the combustion of Moth. ( Dillard. 2010. Holy the Firm. pp. 2-5 ) In the narrative Holy the Firm. I can see the two values of this narrative. which are the decease of the moth and the inspiration for authorship of writers.
When I wrote essay about the common people literature. my instructor said. “You need to explicate what the common people sentence means in the first paragraph. ” Thankss to that. the readers could understand. and follow my essay. In this essay. I merely gave some narratives. and I wanted the readers to happen the value through these narratives. My composing was different the Vietnam composing. so my instructor gave back my essay. and wanted me to repair it. I fixed my essay by explicating the each word in the sentence. After explicating the sentence. I give the illustration in the life. and I need to compose the two faces of this sentence. In decision. I need to compose the value and the utile of the sentence. I could utilize it in my life in the hereafter. If I truly understand this sentence. it will be good for you about consciousness. When I get the failure. I can recognize the errors. In the following clip. I do non do these errors. so I will be success and I do non worry about this failure. I can experience comfy instead than upset. so I am non stress about this failure.
Follow my essay. I can see the difference between English composing and Vietnam composing. In Vietnam composing. I used rhetorical words to do the sentence better such as “too dark. gentle. and warm” ( Trinh. 2011. p. 1 ) . On the other manus. when I write English composing. I need to compose direct statement. non use the adjective. The English composing and Vietnam composing are in common. which is that I have to give the illustrations to back up my thoughts and these illustrations are my experiences. or based on the study to happen the groundss. In my essay. I write some inquiry: “Have you of all time inquire what success is? Is it the perfect consequences in the survey? Or does the word successful mean holding a rich life? ” ( Trinh. 2011. p. 1 ) I have learned that utilizing the inquiry in debut. which attract the Vietnamese readers. and do the readers think about the reply. In contrast. when I want to pull the English-speaking readers. I need to utilize a hook that is interested the readers.
When I study in the United States. I need to alter the wont contorting essay. Sometimes. in my essay. my professors wrote. “I can understand your sentences. but your construction needs work” ( Mott- Smith. 2011. what makes a good pupil or teacher? ) . My construction does non link together. and I merely compose the sentences and set it in the paragraph. My civilization Vietnam influenced the manner I write essays. Sometimes. I write many things. which do non link together and these make the professor lost in my sentences. The similar to English composing. in Vietnam composing. I need to hold the chief point in my essay.
From the chief point. I give the definition about chief point. It can assist the readers to understand what they are reading. Furthermore. I give some illustrations to develop my thought. I need to follow one of import regulation: “do non bias” in English composing. In Vietnam composing. I will give the illustrations to do my thought is true. and sometimes it is non just. For case. when I wrote the statement essay. I merely controlled about my thought. which was right or incorrect. The subject is the statement essay. but I merely give the illustration to back up my thoughts. and I do non give grounds to demo the opposite thought. My Vietnamese instructors did non care about this issue. In decision. I know civilizations have different features for composing. and establishing on each state. I have to utilizing the different types of authorship. I think they have the different ways to understand. so I need to utilize the types of authorship. which are suit for them.